| Products & Services | Solutions | Academia | Support | User Community | Company |
| Download Product Updates | | | Get Pricing | | | Trial Software |
| Documentation → Control System Toolbox |
| Contents | Index |
| Learn more about Control System Toolbox |
| On this page… |
|---|
This final case study illustrates Kalman filter design and simulation. Both steady-state and time-varying Kalman filters are considered.
Consider the discrete plant
![]()
with additive Gaussian noise
on
the input
and data
A = [1.1269 -0.4940 0.1129
1.0000 0 0
0 1.0000 0];
B = [-0.3832
0.5919
0.5191];
C = [1 0 0];
Our goal is to design a Kalman filter that estimates the output
given
the inputs
and the noisy output
measurements
![]()
where
is some Gaussian
white noise.
The equations of the steady-state Kalman filter for this problem are given as follows.
Measurement update
![]()
Time update
![]()
In these equations:
is the estimate of
given
past measurements up to
![]()
is the updated estimate
based on the last measurement
![]()
Given the current estimate
,
the time update predicts the state value at the next sample
(one-step-ahead
predictor). The measurement update then adjusts this prediction based
on the new measurement
. The correction term
is a function of the innovation, that is, the
discrepancy.
![]()
between the measured and predicted values of
.
The innovation gain
is chosen to minimize the steady-state
covariance of the estimation error given the noise covariances
![]()
You can combine the time and measurement update equations into one state-space model (the Kalman filter).

This filter generates an optimal estimate
of
.
Note that the filter state is
.
You can design the steady-state Kalman filter described above with the function kalman. First specify the plant model with the process noise.
![]()
This is done by
% Note: set sample time to -1 to mark model as discrete
Plant = ss(A,[B B],C,0,-1,'inputname',{'u' 'w'},...
'outputname','y');
Assuming that
, you can now design
the discrete Kalman filter by
Q = 1; R = 1; [kalmf,L,P,M] = kalman(Plant,Q,R);
This returns a state-space model kalmf of the filter as well as the innovation gain
M
M =
0.3798
0.0817
-0.2570The inputs of kalmf are
and
,
and its outputs are the plant output and state estimates
and
.

Because you are interested in the output estimate
, keep only the
first output of kalmf. Type
kalmf = kalmf(1,:);
kalmf
a =
x1_e x2_e x3_e
x1_e 0.7683 -0.494 0.1129
x2_e 0.6202 0 0
x3_e -0.08173 1 0
b =
u y
x1_e -0.3832 0.3586
x2_e 0.5919 0.3798
x3_e 0.5191 0.08173
c =
x1_e x2_e x3_e
y_e 0.6202 0 0
d =
u y
y_e 0 0.3798
Input groups:
Name Channels
KnownInput 1
Measurement 2
Output groups:
Name Channels
OutputEstimate 1
Sampling time: unspecified
Discrete-time model.To see how the filter works, generate some input data and random
noise and compare the filtered response
with
the true response
. You can either generate
each response separately, or generate both together. To simulate each
response separately, use lsim with the plant alone
first, and then with the plant and filter hooked up together. The
joint simulation alternative is detailed next.
The block diagram below shows how to generate both true and filtered outputs.

You can construct a state-space model of this block diagram
with the functions parallel and feedback.
First build a complete plant model with
as inputs
and
(measurements)
as outputs.
a = A;
b = [B B 0*B];
c = [C;C];
d = [0 0 0;0 0 1];
P = ss(a,b,c,d,-1,'inputname',{'u' 'w' 'v'},...
'outputname',{'y' 'yv'});
Then use parallel to form the following parallel connection.

sys = parallel(P,kalmf,1,1,[],[])
Finally, close the sensor loop by connecting the plant output
to
the filter input
with positive feedback.
% Close loop around input #4 and output #2 SimModel = feedback(sys,1,4,2,1) % Delete yv from I/O list SimModel = SimModel([1 3],[1 2 3])
The resulting simulation model has
as
inputs and
as outputs.
SimModel.inputname
ans =
'w'
'v'
'u'
SimModel.outputname
ans =
'y'
'y_e'
You are now ready to simulate the filter behavior. Generate
a sinusoidal input
and process and measurement noise
vectors
and
.
t = [0:100]';
u = sin(t/5);
n = length(t)
randn('seed',0)
w = sqrt(Q)*randn(n,1);
v = sqrt(R)*randn(n,1);
Now simulate with lsim.
[out,x] = lsim(SimModel,[w,v,u]); y = out(:,1); % true response ye = out(:,2); % filtered response yv = y + v; % measured response
and compare the true and filtered responses graphically.
subplot(211), plot(t,y,'--',t,ye,'-'),
xlabel('No. of samples'), ylabel('Output')
title('Kalman filter response')
subplot(212), plot(t,y-yv,'-.',t,y-ye,'-'),
xlabel('No. of samples'), ylabel('Error')

The first plot shows the true response
(dashed
line) and the filtered output
(solid
line). The second plot compares the measurement error (dash-dot) with
the estimation error (solid). This plot shows that the noise level
has been significantly reduced. This is confirmed by the following
error covariance
computations.
MeasErr = y-yv; MeasErrCov = sum(MeasErr.*MeasErr)/length(MeasErr); EstErr = y-ye; EstErrCov = sum(EstErr.*EstErr)/length(EstErr);
The error covariance before filtering (measurement error) is
MeasErrCov
MeasErrCov =
1.1138
while the error covariance after filtering (estimation error) is only
EstErrCov
EstErrCov =
0.2722
The time-varying Kalman filter is a generalization of the steady-state filter for time-varying systems or LTI systems with nonstationary noise covariance. Given the plant state and measurement equations
![]()
the time-varying Kalman filter is given by the recursions
Measurement update

Time update
![]()
with
and
as
defined in Discrete Kalman Filter, and in the following.

For simplicity, we have dropped the subscripts indicating the time dependence of the state-space matrices.
Given initial conditions
and
,
you can iterate these equations to perform the filtering. Note that
you must update both the state estimates
and
error covariance matrices
at each time sample.
Although the Control System Toolbox software does not offer specific commands to perform time-varying Kalman filtering, it is easy to implement the filter recursions in the MATLAB environment. This section shows how to do this for the stationary plant considered above.
First generate noisy output measurements
% Use process noise w and measurement noise v generated above sys = ss(A,B,C,0,-1); y = lsim(sys,u+w); % w = process noise yv = y + v; % v = measurement noise
Given the initial conditions
![]()
you can implement the time-varying filter with the following for loop.
P = B*Q*B'; % Initial error covariance x = zeros(3,1); % Initial condition on the state ye = zeros(length(t),1); ycov = zeros(length(t),1); for i=1:length(t) % Measurement update Mn = P*C'/(C*P*C'+R); x = x + Mn*(yv(i)-C*x); % x[n|n] P = (eye(3)-Mn*C)*P; % P[n|n] ye(i) = C*x; errcov(i) = C*P*C'; % Time update x = A*x + B*u(i); % x[n+1|n] P = A*P*A' + B*Q*B'; % P[n+1|n] end
You can now compare the true and estimated output graphically.
subplot(211), plot(t,y,'--',t,ye,'-')
title('Time-varying Kalman filter response')
xlabel('No. of samples'), ylabel('Output')
subplot(212), plot(t,y-yv,'-.',t,y-ye,'-')
xlabel('No. of samples'), ylabel('Output')

The first plot shows the true response
(dashed
line) and the filtered response
(solid
line). The second plot compares the measurement error (dash-dot) with
the estimation error (solid).
The time-varying filter also estimates the covariance errcov of
the estimation error
at each sample. Plot
it to see if your filter reached steady state (as you expect with
stationary input noise).
subplot(211)
plot(t,errcov), ylabel('Error covar')

From this covariance plot, you can see that the output covariance did indeed reach a steady state in about five samples. From then on, your time-varying filter has the same performance as the steady-state version.
Compare with the estimation error covariance derived from the experimental data. Type
EstErr = y-ye;
EstErrCov = sum(EstErr.*EstErr)/length(EstErr)
EstErrCov =
0.2718
This value is smaller than the theoretical value errcov and close to the value obtained for the steady-state design.
Finally, note that the final value
and
the steady-state value
of the innovation gain matrix coincide.
Mn, M
Mn =
0.3798
0.0817
-0.2570
M =
0.3798
0.0817
-0.2570
[1] [Grimble, M.J., Robust Industrial Control: Optimal Design Approach for Polynomial Systems, Prentice Hall, 1994, p. 261 and pp. 443-456.
![]() | LQG Regulation: Rolling Mill Example |

Includes the most popular MATLAB recorded presentations with Q&A sessions led by MATLAB experts.
| © 1984-2009- The MathWorks, Inc. - Site Help - Patents - Trademarks - Privacy Policy - Preventing Piracy - RSS |