| Products & Services | Solutions | Academia | Support | User Community | Company |
| Download Product Updates | | | Get Pricing | | | Trial Software |
| Documentation → Robust Control Toolbox |
| Contents | Index |
Compute solution to given system of LMIs
The function feasp computes a solution xfeas (if any) of the system of LMIs described by lmisys. The vector xfeas is a particular value of the decision variables for which all LMIs are satisfied.
|
(6-5) |
xfeas is computed by solving the auxiliary convex program:
The global minimum of this program is the scalar value tmin returned as first output argument by feasp. The LMI constraints are feasible if tmin
0 and strictly feasible if tmin < 0. If the problem is feasible but not strictly feasible, tmin is positive and very small. Some post-analysis may then be required to decide whether xfeas is close enough to feasible.
The optional argument target sets a target value for tmin. The optimization code terminates as soon as a value of t below this target is reached. The default value is target = 0.
Note that xfeas is a solution in terms of the decision variables and not in terms of the matrix variables of the problem. Use dec2mat to derive feasible values of the matrix variables from xfeas.
The optional argument options gives access to certain control parameters for the optimization algorithm. This five-entry vector is organized as follows:
In other words, the Euclidean norm of xfeas should not exceed R. The feasibility radius is a simple means of controlling the magnitude of solutions. Upon termination, feasp displays the f-radius saturation, that is, the norm of the solution as a percentage of the feasibility radius R.
The default value is R = 109. Setting options(3) to a negative value activates the "flexible bound" mode. In this mode, the feasibility radius is initially set to 108, and increased if necessary during the course of optimization
Setting option(i) to zero is equivalent to setting the corresponding control parameter to its default value. Consequently, there is no need to redefine the entire vector when changing just one control parameter. To set the maximum number of iterations to 10, for instance, it suffices to type
When the least-squares problem solved at each iteration becomes ill conditioned, the feasp solver switches from Cholesky-based to QR-based linear algebra (see Memory Problems for details). Since the QR mode typically requires much more memory, MATLAB® may run out of memory and display the message
You should then ask your system manager to increase your swap space or, if no additional swap space is available, set options(4) = 1. This will prevent switching to QR and feasp will terminate when Cholesky fails due to numerical instabilities.
Consider the problem of finding P > I such that
|
(6-6) |
|
(6-7) |
|
(6-8) |
This problem arises when studying the quadratic stability of the polytope of matrices Co{A1, A2, A3}.
To assess feasibility with feasp, first enter the LMIs (9-8)-(9-10) by:
setlmis([]) p = lmivar(1,[2 1]) lmiterm([1 1 1 p],1,a1,'s') % LMI #1 lmiterm([2 1 1 p],1,a2,'s') % LMI #2 lmiterm([3 1 1 p],1,a3,'s') % LMI #3 lmiterm([-4 1 1 p],1,1) % LMI #4: P lmiterm([4 1 1 0],1) % LMI #4: I lmis = getlmis
Then call feasp to find a feasible decision vector:
This returns tmin = -3.1363. Hence (9-8)-(9-10) is feasible and the dynamical system
= A(t)x is quadratically stable for A(t)
Co{A1, A2, A3}.
To obtain a Lyapunov matrix P proving the quadratic stability, type
It is possible to add further constraints on this feasibility problem. For instance, you can bound the Frobenius norm of P by 10 while asking tmin to be less than or equal to -1. This is done by
The third entry 10 of options sets the feasibility radius to 10 while the third argument -1 sets the target value for tmin. This yields tmin = -1.1745 and a matrix P with largest eigenvalue
max(P) = 9.6912.
The feasibility solver feasp is based on Nesterov and Nemirovski's Projective Method described in
Nesterov, Y., and A. Nemirovski, Interior Point Polynomial Methods in Convex Programming: Theory and Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994.
Nemirovski, A., and P. Gahinet, "The Projective Method for Solving Linear Matrix Inequalities," Proc. Amer. Contr. Conf., 1994, Baltimore, Maryland, p. 840-844.
The optimization is performed by the C-MEX file feaslv.mex.
gevp Generalized eigenvalue minimization under LMI constraints
dec2mat Given values of the decision variables, derive the corresponding values of the matrix variables
| Provide feedback about this page |
![]() | evallmi | fitfrd | ![]() |

Includes the most popular MATLAB recorded presentations with Q&A sessions led by MATLAB experts.
| © 1984-2009- The MathWorks, Inc. - Site Help - Patents - Trademarks - Privacy Policy - Preventing Piracy - RSS |