This is machine translation

Translated by Microsoft
Mouseover text to see original. Click the button below to return to the English verison of the page.

Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Please click here
To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

Conversion Between Model Types

Explicit Conversion Between Model Types

You can explicitly convert a model from one representation to another using the model-creation command for the target model type. For example, convert to state-space representation usingss, and convert to parallel-form PID using pid. For information about converting to a particular model type, see the reference page for that model type.

In general, you can convert from any model type to any other. However, there are a few limitations. For example, you cannot convert:

  • frd models to analytic model types such as ss, tf, or zpk (unless you perform system identification with System Identification Toolbox™ software).

  • ss models with internal delays to tf or zpk.

You can convert between Numeric LTI models and Generalized LTI models.

  • Converting a Generalized LTI model to a Numeric LTI model evaluates any Control Design Blocks at their current (nominal) value.

  • Converting a Numeric LTI model to a Generalized LTI model creates a Generalized LTI model with an empty Blocks property.

Automatic Conversion Between Model Types

Some algorithms operate only on one type of model object. For example, the algorithm for zero-order-hold discretization with c2d can only be performed on state-space models. Similarly, commands such as tfdata or piddata expect a particular type of model (tf or pid, respectively). For convenience, such commands automatically convert input models to the appropriate or required model type. For example:

sys = ss(0,1,1,0)
[num,den] = tfdata(sys)

tfdata automatically converts the state-space model sys to transfer function form to return numerator and denominator data.

Conversions to state-space form are not uniquely defined. For this reason, automatic conversions to state space do not occur when the result depends on the choice of state coordinates. For example, the initial and kalman commands require state-space models.

Recommended Working Representation

You can represent numeric system components using any model type. However, Numeric LTI model types are not equally well-suited for numerical computations. In general, it is recommended that you work with state-space (ss) or frequency response data (frd) models, for the following reasons:

  • The accuracy of computations using high-order transfer functions (tf or zpk models) is sometimes poor, particularly for MIMO or high-order systems. Conversions to a transfer function representation can incur a loss of accuracy.

  • When you convert tf or zpk models to state space using ss, the software automatically performs balancing and scaling operations. Balancing and scaling improves the numeric accuracy of computations involving the model. For more information about balancing and scaling state-space models, see Scaling State-Space Models.

In addition, converting back and forth between model types can introduce additional states or orders, or introduce numeric inaccuracies. For example, conversions to state space are not uniquely defined, and are not guaranteed to produce a minimal realization for MIMO models. For a given state-space model sys,


can return a model with different state-space matrices, or even a different number of states in the MIMO case.

See Also

| | | |

Related Examples

Was this topic helpful?