Adjust Markov chain state inertia
lc = lazy(mc)
lc = lazy(mc,w)
Consider this three-state transition matrix.
Create the irreducible and periodic Markov chain that is characterized by the transition matrix P.
P = [0 1 0; 0 0 1; 1 0 0]; mc = dtmc(P);
At time t = 1,..., T,
mc is forced to move to another state deterministically.
Determine the stationary distribution of the Markov chain and whether its ergodic.
xFix = asymptotics(mc) isergodic(mc)
xFix = 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333 ans = logical 0
mc is irreducible and not ergodic. As a result,
mc has a stationary distribution, but it is not a limiting distribution for all initial distributions.
xFix is not a limiting distribution for all initial distributions.
x0 = [1 0 0]; x1 = x0*P x2 = x1*P x3 = x2*P sum(x3 == x0) == mc.NumStates
x1 = 0 1 0 x2 = 0 0 1 x3 = 1 0 0 ans = logical 1
The initial distribution is reached again after several steps, which implies that the subsequent state distributions cycle through the same sets of distributions indefinitely. Therefore,
mc does not have a limiting distribution.
Create an lazy version of the Markov chain
lc = lazy(mc) lc.P
lc = dtmc with properties: P: [3x3 double] StateNames: ["1" "2" "3"] NumStates: 3 ans = 0.5000 0.5000 0 0 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0 0.5000
lc is a
dtmc object. At time t = 1,..., T,
lc flips a fair coin. It remains in its current state if the coin shows heads and transitions to another state if the coin shows tails.
Determine the stationary distribution of the lazy chain and whether its ergodic.
lcxFix = asymptotics(lc) isergodic(lc)
lcxFix = 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333 ans = logical 1
mc have the same stationary distributions, but only
lc is ergodic. Therefore, the limiting distribution of
lc exists and is equal to its stationary distribution.
Consider this theoretical, right-stochastic transition matrix of a stochastic process.
Create the Markov chain that is characterized by the transition matrix P.
P = [ 0 0 1/2 1/4 1/4 0 0 ; 0 0 1/3 0 2/3 0 0 ; 0 0 0 0 0 1/3 2/3; 0 0 0 0 0 1/2 1/2; 0 0 0 0 0 3/4 1/4; 1/2 1/2 0 0 0 0 0 ; 1/4 3/4 0 0 0 0 0 ]; mc = dtmc(P);
Plot the eigenvalues of the transition matrix on the complex plane.
figure; eigplot(mc); title('Original Markov Chain')
There are three eigenvalues with modulus one, which indicates that the period of
mc is three.
For illustration, create lazy versions of the Markov chain
mc using various inertial weights. Plot the eigenvalues of the lazy chains on separate complex planes.
w2 = 0.1; % More active Markov chain w3 = 0.9; % Lazier Markov chain w4 = [0.9 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.001 0.999]; % Laziness differs between states lc1 = lazy(mc); lc2 = lazy(mc,w2); lc3 = lazy(mc,w3); lc4 = lazy(mc,w4); figure; eigplot(lc1); title('Default Laziness'); figure; eigplot(lc2); title('More Active Chain'); figure; eigplot(lc3); title('Lazier Chain'); figure; eigplot(lc4); title('Differing Laziness Levels');
All lazy chains have only one eigenvalue with modulus one. Therefore, they are aperiodic. The spectral gap (distance between inner and outer circle) determines the mixing time. Observe that all lazy chains take longer to mix than the original Markov chain. In particular, chains with different inertial weights than the default take longer to mix than the default lazy chain.
mc— Discrete-time Markov chain
Discrete-time Markov chain with
NumStates states and transition matrix
P, specified as a
w— Inertial weights
0.5(default) | numeric scalar | numeric vector
Inertial weights, specified as a numeric scalar or vector of length
NumStates. Values must be between
w is a scalar,
applies it to all states. That is, the transition matrix of the
lazy chain (
lc.P) is the result of this
mc.Pand I is the
w is a vector,
applies the weights state by state (row by row).
A lazy version of a Markov chain has, for each state, a probability of staying in the same state equal to at least 0.5.
In a directed graph of a Markov chain, the default lazy
transformation ensures self-loops on all states, eliminating periodicity. If the
Markov chain is irreducible, then its lazy version is ergodic. See
 Gallager, R.G. Stochastic Processes: Theory for Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.