Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Please click here

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

In the Neyman-Pearson framework, the probability of detection is maximized subject to the constraint that the false-alarm probability does not exceed a specified level. The false-alarm probability depends on the noise variance. Therefore, to calculate the false-alarm probability, you must first estimate the noise variance. If the noise variance changes, you must adjust the threshold to maintain a constant false-alarm rate. *Constant false-alarm rate detectors* implement adaptive procedures that enable you to update the threshold level of your test when the power of the interference changes.

To motivate the need for an adaptive procedure, assume a simple binary hypothesis test where you must decide between the signal-absent and signal-present hypotheses for a single sample. The signal has amplitude 4, and the noise is zero-mean gaussian with unit variance.

First, set the false-alarm rate to 0.001 and determine the threshold.

```
T = npwgnthresh(1e-3,1,'real');
threshold = sqrt(db2pow(T))
```

threshold = 3.0902

Check that this threshold yields the desired false-alarm rate probability and then compute the probability of detection.

pfa = 0.5*erfc(threshold/sqrt(2)) pd = 0.5*erfc((threshold-4)/sqrt(2))

pfa = 1.0000e-03 pd = 0.8185

Next, assume that the noise power increases by 6.02 dB, doubling the noise variance. If your detector does not adapt to this increase in variance by determining a new threshold, your false-alarm rate increases significantly.

pfa = 0.5*erfc(threshold/2)

pfa = 0.0144

The following figure shows the effect of increasing the noise variance on the false-alarm probability for a fixed threshold.

noisevar = 1:0.1:10; noisepower = 10*log10(noisevar); pfa = 0.5*erfc(threshold./sqrt(2*noisevar)); semilogy(noisepower,pfa./1e-3) grid on title('Increase in P_{FA} due to Noise Variance') ylabel('Increase in P_{FA} (Orders of Magnitude)') xlabel('Noise Power Increase (dB)')

The cell-averaging CFAR detector estimates the noise variance
for the range cell of interest, or *cell under test*,
by analyzing data from neighboring range cells designated as *training
cells*. The noise characteristics in the training cells
are assumed to be identical to the noise characteristics in the cell
under test (CUT).

This assumption is key in justifying the use of the training cells to estimate the noise variance in the CUT. Additionally, the cell-averaging CFAR detector assumes that the training cells do not contain any signals from targets. Thus, the data in the training cells are assumed to consist of noise only.

To make these assumptions realistic:

It is preferable to have some buffer, or

*guard cells*, between the CUT and the training cells. The buffer provided by the guard cells*guards*against signal leaking into the training cells and adversely affecting the estimation of the noise variance.The training cells should not represent range cells too distant in range from the CUT, as the following figure illustrates.

The optimum estimator for the noise variance depends on distributional assumptions and the type of detector. Assume the following:

You are using a square-law detector.

You have a Gaussian, complex-valued, random variable (RV) with independent real and imaginary parts.

The real and imaginary parts each have mean zero and variance equal to σ

^{2}/2.### Note

If you denote this RV by Z=U+jV, the squared magnitude |Z|

^{2}follows an exponential distribution with mean σ^{2}.

If the samples in training cells are the squared magnitudes of such complex Gaussian RVs, you can use the sample mean as an estimator of the noise variance.

To implement cell-averaging CFAR detection, use `phased.CFARDetector`

.
You can customize characteristics of the detector such as the numbers
of training cells and guard cells, and the probability of false alarm.

This example shows how to create a CFAR detector and test its ability to adapt to the statistics of input data. The test uses noise-only trials. By using the default square-law detector, you can determine how close the empirical false-alarm rate is to the desired false-alarm probability.

**Note:** This example runs only in R2016b or later. If you are using an earlier release, replace each call to the function with the equivalent `step`

syntax. For example, replace `myObject(x)`

with `step(myObject,x)`

.

Create a CFAR detector object with two guard cells, 20 training cells, and a false-alarm probability of 0.001. By default, this object assumes a square-law detector with no pulse integration.

detector = phased.CFARDetector('NumGuardCells',2,... 'NumTrainingCells',20,'ProbabilityFalseAlarm',1e-3);

There are 10 training cells and 1 guard cell on each side of the *cell under test* (CUT). Set the CUT index to 12.

CUTidx = 12;

Seed the random number generator for a reproducible set of input data.

rng(1000);

Set the noise variance to 0.25. This value corresponds to an approximate -6 dB SNR. Generate a 23-by-10000 matrix of complex-valued, white Gaussian rv's with the specified variance. Each row of the matrix represents 10,000 Monte Carlo trials for a single cell.

Ntrials = 1e4; variance = 0.25; Ncells = 23; inputdata = sqrt(variance/2)*(randn(Ncells,Ntrials)+1j*randn(Ncells,Ntrials));

Because the example implements a square-law detector, take the squared magnitudes of the elements in the data matrix.

Z = abs(inputdata).^2;

Provide the output from the square-law operator and the index of the cell under test to the CFAR detector.

Z_detect = detector(Z,CUTidx);

The output, `Z_detect`

, is a logical vector with 10,000 elements. Sum the elements in `Z_detect`

and divide by the total number of trials to obtain the empirical false-alarm rate.

pfa = sum(Z_detect)/Ntrials

pfa = 0.0013

The empirical false-alarm rate is 0.0013, which corresponds closely to the desired false-alarm rate of 0.001.

The cell-averaging algorithm for a CFAR detector works well
in many situations, but not all. For example, when targets are closely
located, cell averaging can cause a strong target to mask a weak target
nearby. The `phased.CFARDetector`

System
object™ supports
the following CFAR detection algorithms.

Algorithm | Typical Usage |
---|---|

Cell-averaging CFAR | Most situations |

Greatest-of cell-averaging CFAR | When it is important to avoid false alarms at the edge of clutter |

Smallest-of cell-averaging CFAR | When targets are closely located |

Order statistic CFAR | Compromise between greatest-of and smallest-of cell averaging |

This example shows how to compare the probability of detection resulting from two CFAR algorithms. In this scenario, the order statistic algorithm detects a target that the cell-averaging algorithm does not.

**Note:** This example runs only in R2016b or later. If you are using an earlier release, replace each call to the function with the equivalent `step`

syntax. For example, replace `myObject(x)`

with `step(myObject,x)`

.

Create a CFAR detector that uses the cell-averaging CFAR algorithm.

Ntraining = 10; Nguard = 2; Pfa_goal = 0.01; detector = phased.CFARDetector('Method','CA',... 'NumTrainingCells',Ntraining,'NumGuardCells',Nguard,... 'ProbabilityFalseAlarm',Pfa_goal);

The detector has 2 guard cells, 10 training cells, and a false-alarm probability of 0.01. This object assumes a square-law detector with no pulse integration.

Generate a vector of input data based on a complex-valued white Gaussian random variable.

```
Ncells = 23;
Ntrials = 100000;
inputdata = 1/sqrt(2)*(randn(Ncells,Ntrials) + ...
1i*randn(Ncells,Ntrials));
```

In the input data, replace rows 8 and 12 to simulate two targets for the CFAR detector to detect.

inputdata(8,:) = 3*exp(1i*2*pi*rand); inputdata(12,:) = 9*exp(1i*2*pi*rand);

Because the example implements a square-law detector, take the squared magnitudes of the elements in the input data vector.

Z = abs(inputdata).^2;

Perform the detection on rows 8 through 12.

Z_detect = detector(Z,8:12);

The `Z_detect`

matrix has five rows. The first and last rows correspond to the simulated targets. The three middle rows correspond to noise.

Compute the probability of detection of the two targets. Also, estimate the probability of false alarm using the noise-only rows.

Pd_1 = sum(Z_detect(1,:))/Ntrials

Pd_1 = 0

Pd_2 = sum(Z_detect(end,:))/Ntrials

Pd_2 = 1

Pfa = max(sum(Z_detect(2:end-1,:),2)/Ntrials)

Pfa = 6.0000e-05

The `0`

value of `Pd_1`

indicates that this detector does not detect the first target.

Change the CFAR detector so it uses the order statistic CFAR algorithm with a rank of 5.

```
release(detector);
detector.Method = 'OS';
detector.Rank = 5;
```

Repeat the detection and probability computations.

Z_detect = detector(Z,8:12); Pd_1 = sum(Z_detect(1,:))/Ntrials

Pd_1 = 0.5820

Pd_2 = sum(Z_detect(end,:))/Ntrials

Pd_2 = 1

Pfa = max(sum(Z_detect(2:end-1,:),2)/Ntrials)

Pfa = 0.0066

Using the order statistic algorithm instead of the cell-averaging algorithm, the detector detects the first target in about 58% of the trials.

Was this topic helpful?