Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Please click here

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

In phased-array applications, you sometimes need to decide between
two competing hypotheses to determine the reality underlying the data
the array receives. For example, suppose one hypothesis, called the *null
hypothesis*, states that the observed data consists of
noise only. Suppose another hypothesis, called the *alternative
hypothesis*, states that the observed data consists of
a deterministic signal plus noise. To decide, you must formulate a
decision rule that uses specified criteria to choose between the two
hypotheses.

When you use Phased Array System Toolbox™ software for applications such as radar and sonar, you typically use the Neyman-Pearson (NP) optimality criterion to formulate your hypothesis test.

When you choose the NP criterion, you can use `npwgnthresh`

to determine the threshold
for the detection of deterministic signals in white Gaussian noise.
The optimal decision rule derives from a *likelihood ratio
test* (LRT). An LRT chooses between the null and alternative
hypotheses based on a ratio of conditional probabilities.

`npwgnthresh`

enables you to specify the
maximum false-alarm probability as a constraint. A *false
alarm* means determining that the data consists of a signal
plus noise, when only noise is present.

For details about the statistical assumptions the `npwgnthresh`

function
makes, see the reference page for that function.

This example shows how to compute empirically the probability of false alarm for a real-valued signal in white Gaussian noise.

Determine the required signal-to-noise (SNR) in decibels for the NP detector when the maximum tolerable false-alarm probability is 10^-3.

```
Pfa = 1e-3;
T = npwgnthresh(Pfa,1,'real');
```

Determine the actual detection threshold corresponding to the desired false-alarm probability, assuming the variance is 1.

variance = 1; threshold = sqrt(variance * db2pow(T));

Verify empirically that the detection threshold results in the desired false-alarm probability under the null hypothesis. To do so, generate 1 million samples of a Gaussian random variable, and determine the proportion of samples that exceed the threshold.

```
rng default
N = 1e6;
x = sqrt(variance) * randn(N,1);
falsealarmrate = sum(x > threshold)/N
```

falsealarmrate = 9.9500e-04

Plot the first 10,000 samples. The red horizontal line shows the detection threshold.

x1 = x(1:1e4); plot(x1) line([1 length(x1)],[threshold threshold],'Color','red') xlabel('Sample') ylabel('Value')

You can see that few sample values exceed the threshold. This result is expected because of the small false-alarm probability.

This example shows how to empirically verify the probability of false alarm in a system that integrates two real-valued pulses. In this scenario, each integrated sample is the sum of two samples, one from each pulse.

Determine the required SNR for the NP detector when the maximum tolerable false-alarm probability is .

```
pfa = 1e-3;
T = npwgnthresh(pfa,2,'real');
```

Generate two sets of one million samples of a Gaussian random variable.

```
rng default
variance = 1;
N = 1e6;
pulse1 = sqrt(variance)*randn(N,1);
pulse2 = sqrt(variance)*randn(N,1);
intpuls = pulse1 + pulse2;
```

Compute the proportion of samples that exceed the threshold.

threshold = sqrt(variance*db2pow(T)); falsealarmrate = sum(intpuls > threshold)/N

falsealarmrate = 9.8900e-04

The empirical false alarm rate is very close to .001

This example shows how to empirically verify the probability of false alarm in a system that uses *coherent detection* of complex-valued signals. Coherent detection means that the system utilizes information about the phase of the complex-valued signals.

Determine the required SNR for the NP detector in a coherent detection scheme with one sample. Use a maximum tolerable false-alarm probability of .

```
pfa = 1e-3;
T = npwgnthresh(pfa,1,'coherent');
```

Test that this threshold empirically results in the correct false-alarm rate The sufficient statistic in the complex-valued case is the real part of the received sample.

```
rng default
variance = 1;
N = 1e6;
x = sqrt(variance/2)*(randn(N,1)+1j*randn(N,1));
threshold = sqrt(variance*db2pow(T));
falsealarmrate = sum(real(x)>threshold)/length(x)
```

falsealarmrate = 9.9500e-04

Was this topic helpful?