Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Please click here

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

This example uses the Robust Control Toolbox™ commands `ucover`

and `dksyn`

to design a high-performance controller for a family of unstable plants.

The nominal plant model consists of a first-order unstable system.

Pnom = tf(2,[1 -2]);

The family of perturbed plants are variations of `Pnom`

. All plants have a single unstable pole but the location of this pole varies across the family.

p1 = Pnom*tf(1,[.06 1]); % extra lag p2 = Pnom*tf([-.02 1],[.02 1]); % time delay p3 = Pnom*tf(50^2,[1 2*.1*50 50^2]); % high frequency resonance p4 = Pnom*tf(70^2,[1 2*.2*70 70^2]); % high frequency resonance p5 = tf(2.4,[1 -2.2]); % pole/gain migration p6 = tf(1.6,[1 -1.8]); % pole/gain migration

For feedback design purposes, we need to replace this set of models with a single uncertain plant model whose range of behaviors includes `p1`

through `p6`

. This is one use of the command `ucover`

. This command takes an array of LTI models `Parray`

and a nominal model `Pnom`

and models the difference `Parray-Pnom`

as multiplicative uncertainty in the system dynamics.

Because `ucover`

expects an array of models, use the `stack`

command to gather the plant models `p1`

through `p6`

into one array.

Parray = stack(1,p1,p2,p3,p4,p5,p6);

Next, use `ucover`

to "cover" the range of behaviors `Parray`

with an uncertain model of the form

P = Pnom * (1 + Wt * Delta)

where all uncertainty is concentrated in the "unmodeled dynamics" `Delta`

(a `ultidyn`

object). Because the gain of `Delta`

is uniformly bounded by 1 at all frequencies, a "shaping" filter `Wt`

is used to capture how the relative amount of uncertainty varies with frequency. This filter is also referred to as the uncertainty weighting function. Try a 4th-order filter `Wt`

for this example:

```
orderWt = 4;
Parrayg = frd(Parray,logspace(-1,3,60));
[P,Info] = ucover(Parrayg,Pnom,orderWt,'InputMult');
```

The resulting model `P`

is a single-input, single-output uncertain state-space (USS) object with nominal value `Pnom`

.

P

P = Uncertain continuous-time state-space model with 1 outputs, 1 inputs, 5 states. The model uncertainty consists of the following blocks: Parrayg_InputMultDelta: Uncertain 1x1 LTI, peak gain = 1, 1 occurrences Type "P.NominalValue" to see the nominal value, "get(P)" to see all properties, and "P.Uncertainty" to interact with the uncertain elements.

tf(P.NominalValue)

ans = 2 ----- s - 2 Continuous-time transfer function.

A Bode magnitude plot confirms that the shaping filter `Wt`

"covers" the relative variation in plant behavior. As a function of frequency, the uncertainty level is 30% at 5 rad/sec (-10dB = 0.3) , 50% at 10 rad/sec, and 100% beyond 29 rad/sec.

Wt = Info.W1; bodemag((Pnom-Parray)/Pnom,'b--',Wt,'r'); grid title('Relative Gaps vs. Magnitude of Wt')

To design a robust controller for the uncertain plant model `P`

, we choose a desired closed-loop bandwidth and minimize the sensitivity to disturbances at the plant output. The control structure is shown below. The signals `d`

and `n`

are the load disturbance and measurement noise. The controller uses a noisy measurement of the plant output `y`

to generate the control signal `u`

.

**Figure 1**: Control Structure.

The filters `Wperf`

and `Wnoise`

are selected to enforce the desired bandwidth and some adequate roll-off. The closed-loop transfer function from `[d;n]`

to `y`

is

y = [Wperf * S , Wnoise * T] [d;n]

where `S=1/(1+PC)`

and `T=PC/(1+PC)`

are the sensitivity and complementary sensitivity functions. If we design a controller that keeps the closed-loop gain from `[d;n]`

to `y`

below 1, then

|S| < 1/|Wperf| , |T| < 1/|Wnoise|

By choosing appropriate magnitude profiles for `Wperf`

and `Wnoise`

, we can enforce small sensitivity (`S`

) inside the bandwidth and adequate roll-off (`T`

) outside the bandwidth.

For example, choose `Wperf`

as a first-order low-pass filter with a DC gain of 500 and a gain crossover at the desired bandwidth `desBW`

:

desBW = 4.5; Wperf = makeweight(500,desBW,0.33); tf(Wperf)

ans = 0.33 s + 4.248 -------------- s + 0.008496 Continuous-time transfer function.

Similarly, pick `Wnoise`

as a second-order high-pass filter with a magnitude of 1 at `10*desBW`

. This will force the open-loop gain `PC`

to roll-off with a slope of -2 for frequencies beyond `10*desBW`

.

NF = (10*desBW)/20; % numerator corner frequency DF = (10*desBW)*50; % denominator corner frequency Wnoise = tf([1/NF^2 2*0.707/NF 1],[1/DF^2 2*0.707/DF 1]); Wnoise = Wnoise/abs(freqresp(Wnoise,10*desBW))

Wnoise = 0.1975 s^2 + 0.6284 s + 1 ------------------------------ 7.901e-05 s^2 + 0.2514 s + 400 Continuous-time transfer function.

Verify that the bounds `1/Wperf`

and `1/Wnoise`

on `S`

and `T`

do enforce the desired bandwidth and roll-off.

bodemag(1/Wperf,'b',1/Wnoise,'r',{1e-2,1e3}), grid title('Performance and roll-off specifications') legend('Bound on |S|','Bound on |T|','Location','NorthEast')

Next use `connect`

to build the open-loop interconnection (block diagram in Figure 1 without the controller block). Specify each block appearing in Figure 1, name the signals coming in and out of each block, and let `connect`

do the wiring:

P.u = 'u'; P.y = 'yp'; Wperf.u = 'd'; Wperf.y = 'Wperf'; Wnoise.u = 'n'; Wnoise.y = 'Wnoise'; S1 = sumblk('e = -ym'); S2 = sumblk('y = yp + Wperf'); S3 = sumblk('ym = y + Wnoise'); G = connect(P,Wperf,Wnoise,S1,S2,S3,{'d','n','u'},{'y','e'});

`G`

is a 3-input, 2-output uncertain system suitable for robust controller synthesis with `dksyn`

.

The design is carried out with the automated robust design command `dksyn`

. The target bandwidth is 4.5 rad/s.

ny = 1; nu = 1; [C,CL,muPerf] = dksyn(G,ny,nu); muPerf

muPerf = 0.9945

When the robust performance indicator `muPerf`

is near 1, the controller achieves the target closed-loop bandwidth and roll-off. As a rule of thumb, if `muPerf`

is less than 0.85, then the performance can be improved upon, and if `muPerf`

is greater than 1.2, then the desired closed-loop bandwidth is not achievable for the specified plant uncertainty.

Here `muPerf`

is approximately 1 so the objectives are met. The resulting controller `C`

has 18 states:

size(C)

State-space model with 1 outputs, 1 inputs, and 18 states.

You can use the `reduce`

and `dksynperf`

commands to simplify this controller. Compute approximations of orders 1 through 17.

Cappx = reduce(C,1:17);

For each reduced-order controller, use `dksynperf`

to compute the robust performance indicator and compare it with `muPerf`

. Keep the lowest-order controller with performance no worse than 1.05 * `muPerf`

, a performance degradation of 5% or less.

for k=1:17 Cr = Cappx(:,:,k); % controller of order k bnd = dksynperf(lft(G,Cr)); if bnd.UpperBound < 1.05 * muPerf break % abort with the first controller meeting the performance goal end end order(Cr)

ans = 6

This yields a 6th-order controller `Cr`

with comparable performance. Compare `Cr`

with the full-order controller `C`

.

opt = bodeoptions; opt.Grid = 'on'; opt.PhaseMatching = 'on'; bodeplot(C,'b',Cr,'r--',opt) legend('18-state controller C','6-state controller Cr','Location','NorthEast')

Plot the open-loop responses of the plant models `p1`

through `p6`

with the simplified controller `Cr`

.

```
bodeplot(Parray*Cr,'g',{1e-2,1e3},opt);
```

Plot the responses to a step disturbance at the plant output. These are consistent with the desired closed-loop bandwidth and robust to the plant variations, as expected from a Robust Performance mu-value of approximately 1.

```
step(feedback(1,Parray*Cr),'g',10/desBW);
```

The same design process can be repeated for different closed-loop bandwidth values `desBW`

. Doing so yields the following results:

Using

`desBW`

= 8 yields a good design with robust performance`muPerf`

of 1.09. The step responses across the`Parray`

family are consistent with a closed-loop bandwidth of 8 rad/s.

Using

`desBW`

= 20 yields a poor design with robust performance`muPerf`

of 1.35. This is expected because this target bandwidth is in the vicinity of very large plant uncertainty. Some of the step responses for the plants`p1,...,p6`

are actually unstable.

Using

`desBW`

= 0.3 yields a poor design with robust performance`muPerf`

of 2.2. This is expected because`Wnoise`

imposes roll-off past 3 rad/s, which is too close to the natural frequency of the unstable pole (2 rad/s). In other words, proper control of the unstable dynamics requires a higher bandwidth than specified.

Was this topic helpful?