This is machine translation

Translated by Microsoft
Mouseover text to see original. Click the button below to return to the English verison of the page.

Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Please click here
To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

LMI Applications

Finding a solution x to the LMI system

A(x) < 0(3-3)

is called the feasibility problem. Minimizing a convex objective under LMI constraints is also a convex problem. In particular, the linear objective minimization problem:

Minimize cTx subject to

A(x) < 0(3-4)

plays an important role in LMI-based design. Finally, the generalized eigenvalue minimization problem

Minimize λ subject to


is quasi-convex and can be solved by similar techniques. It owes its name to the fact that is related to the largest generalized eigenvalue of the pencil (A(x),B(x)).

Many control problems and design specifications have LMI formulations [9]. This is especially true for Lyapunov-based analysis and design, but also for optimal LQG control, H control, covariance control, etc. Further applications of LMIs arise in estimation, identification, optimal design, structural design [6], [7], matrix scaling problems, and so on. The main strength of LMI formulations is the ability to combine various design constraints or objectives in a numerically tractable manner.

A nonexhaustive list of problems addressed by LMI techniques includes the following:

  • Robust stability of systems with LTI uncertainty (µ-analysis) ([24], [21], [27])

  • Robust stability in the face of sector-bounded nonlinearities (Popov criterion) ([22], [28], [13], [16])

  • Quadratic stability of differential inclusions ([15], [8])

  • Lyapunov stability of parameter-dependent systems ([12])

  • Input/state/output properties of LTI systems (invariant ellipsoids, decay rate, etc.) ([9])

  • Multi-model/multi-objective state feedback design ([4], [17], [3], [9], [10])

  • Robust pole placement

  • Optimal LQG control ([9])

  • Robust H control ([11], [14])

  • Multi-objective H synthesis ([18], [23], [10], [18])

  • Design of robust gain-scheduled controllers ([5], [2])

  • Control of stochastic systems ([9])

  • Weighted interpolation problems ([9])

To hint at the principles underlying LMI design, let's review the LMI formulations of a few typical design objectives.


The stability of the dynamic system


is equivalent to the feasibility of the following problem:

Find P = PT such that AT P + P A < 0, P > I.

This can be generalized to linear differential inclusions (LDI)


where A(t) varies in the convex envelope of a set of LTI models:


A sufficient condition for the asymptotic stability of this LDI is the feasibility of

Find P = PT such that AiTP+PAi<0,P>I.

RMS Gain

The random-mean-squares (RMS) gain of a stable LTI system


is the largest input/output gain over all bounded inputs u(t). This gain is the global minimum of the following linear objective minimization problem [1], [25], [26].

Minimize γ over X = XT and γ such that




LQG Performance

For a stable LTI system


where w is a white noise disturbance with unit covariance, the LQG or H2 performance ∥G2 is defined by


It can be shown that


Hence G22 is the global minimum of the LMI problem. Minimize Trace (Q) over the symmetric matrices P,Q such that




Again this is a linear objective minimization problem since the objective Trace (Q) is linear in the decision variables (free entries of P,Q).

Related Topics

Was this topic helpful?