## Documentation Center |

This example shows how to reduce bias and variability in the periodogram. Using a window can reduce the bias in the periodogram and using windows with averaging can reduce variability.

Use wide-sense stationary autoregressive processes (AR) processes to show the effects of bias and variability in the periodogram. AR processes present a convenient model because their PSDs have closed-form expressions. Create an AR(2) model of the following form:

where ε(n) is a zero mean white noise sequence with some specified variance. In this example, assume the variance and the sampling period to be 1. To simulate the preceding AR(2) process, create an all-pole (IIR) filter. View the filter's magnitude response.

B2 = 1; A2 = [1 -0.75 0.5]; fvtool(B2,A2);

This process is bandpass. The dynamic range of the PSD is approximately 14.5 dB, you can determine this with the following code.

[H2,W2] = freqz(B2,A2,1e3,1); max(20*log10(abs(H2)))-min(20*log10(abs(H2)))

By examining the placement of the poles, you see that this AR(2) process is stable. The two poles are inside the unit circle.

fvtool(B2,A2,'analysis','polezero');

Create an AR(4) process described by the following equation:

Use the following code to view the magnitude response of this IIR system.

B4 = 1; A4 = [1 -2.7607 3.8106 -2.6535 0.9238]; fvtool(B4,A4);

Examining the placement of the poles, you can see this AR(4) process is also stable. The four poles are inside the unit circle.

fvtool(B4,A4,'analysis','polezero');

The dynamic range of this PSD is approximately 65 dB, much larger than the AR(2) model.

[H4,W4] = freqz(B4,A4,1e3,1); max(20*log10(abs(H4)))-min(20*log10(abs(H4)))

To simulate realizations from these AR(p) processes, use `randn` and `filter`.
Set the random number generator to the default settings to produce
repeatable results. Plot the realizations.

rng default; x = randn(1e3,1); y2 = filter(B2,A2,x); y4 = filter(B4,A4,x); subplot(211) plot(y2); title('AR(2) Process'); xlabel('Time'); ylabel('Amplitude'); subplot(212); plot(y4); title('AR(4) Process'); xlabel('Time'); ylabel('Amplitude');

Compute the periodograms of the AR(2) and AR(4) realizations. Plot the result and compare the periodogram against the true PSD.

Fs = 1; NFFT = length(y2); [psdAR2,Fxx] = periodogram(y2,rectwin(length(y2)),length(y2),1); psdAR4 = periodogram(y4,rectwin(length(y2)),length(y2),1); subplot(211) plot(Fxx,10*log10(psdAR2)); hold on; plot(W2,20*log10(abs(H2)),'r','linewidth',2); title('AR(2) PSD and Periodogram'); subplot(212) plot(Fxx,10*log10(psdAR4)); hold on; plot(W4,20*log10(abs(H4)),'r','linewidth',2); xlabel('Hz'); ylabel('dB'); title('AR(4) PSD and Periodogram');

In the case of the AR(2) process, the periodogram estimate follows the shape of the true PSD but exhibits considerable variability. This is due to the low degrees of freedom. The pronounced negative deflections (in dB) in the periodogram are explained by taking the log of a chi-square random variable with two degrees of freedom.

In the case of the AR(4) process, the periodogram follows the shape of the true PSD at low frequencies but deviates from the PSD in the high frequencies. This is the effect of the convolution with Fejer's kernel. The large dynamic range of the AR(4) process compared to the AR(2) process is what makes the bias more pronounced.

Mitigate the bias demonstrated in the AR(4) process by using a taper, or window. In this example, use a Hamming window to taper the AR(4) realization before obtaining the periodogram.

[psdAR4H,Fxx] = periodogram(y4,hamming(length(y4)),NFFT,Fs); plot(Fxx,10*log10(psdAR4H)); hold on; plot(W4,20*log10(abs(H4)),'r','linewidth',2); xlabel('Hz'); ylabel('dB'); title('AR(4) PSD and Periodogram with Hamming Window'); legend('Periodogram with Hamming Window','AR(4) PSD',... 'Location','NorthEast');

Note that the periodogram estimate now follows the true AR(4) PSD over the entire [0,Nyquist] frequency range. The periodogram estimates still only have two degrees of freedom so the use of a window does not reduce the variability of periodogram, but it does address bias.

In nonparametric spectral estimation, two methods for increasing the degrees of freedom and reducing the variability of the periodogram are Welch's overlapped segment averaging and multitaper spectral estimation.

Obtain a multitaper estimate of the AR(4) time series using a time half bandwidth product of 3.5. Plot the result.

NW = 3.5; [psdmtm,Fxx] = pmtm(y4,NW,NFFT,Fs); plot(Fxx,10*log10(psdmtm)); hold on; plot(W4,20*log10(abs(H4)),'r','linewidth',2); xlabel('Hz'); ylabel('dB'); legend('Multitaper Estimate','AR(4) PSD', ... 'Location','NorthEast');

The multitaper method produces a PSD estimate with significantly
less variability than the periodogram. Because the multitaper method
also uses *windows*, you see that the bias of the
periodogram is also addressed.

Was this topic helpful?