Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Please click here

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

This example shows how to perform a regression
with categorical covariates using categorical arrays and `fitlm`

.

`load('carsmall')`

The variable `MPG`

contains measurements on
the miles per gallon of 100 sample cars. The model year of each car
is in the variable `Model_Year`

, and `Weight`

contains
the weight of each car.

Draw a scatter plot of `MPG`

against `Weight`

,
grouped by model year.

figure() gscatter(Weight,MPG,Model_Year,'bgr','x.o') title('MPG vs. Weight, Grouped by Model Year')

The grouping variable, `Model_Year`

,
has three unique values, `70`

, `76`

,
and `82`

, corresponding to model years 1970, 1976,
and 1982.

Create a table that contains the variables `MPG`

, `Weight`

,
and `Model_Year`

. Convert the variable `Model_Year`

to
a nominal array.

cars = table(MPG,Weight,Model_Year); cars.Model_Year = nominal(cars.Model_Year);

Fit a regression model using `fitlm`

with `MPG`

as
the dependent variable, and `Weight`

and `Model_Year`

as
the independent variables. Because `Model_Year`

is
a categorical covariate with three levels, it should enter the model
as two indicator variables.

The scatter plot suggests that the slope of `MPG`

against `Weight`

might
differ for each model year. To assess this, include weight-year interaction
terms.

The proposed model is

$$E(MPG)={\beta}_{0}+{\beta}_{1}Weight+{\beta}_{2}I[1976]+{\beta}_{3}I[1982]+{\beta}_{4}Weight\times I[1976]+{\beta}_{5}Weight\times I[1982],$$

where * I*[1976]
and

`fit = fitlm(cars,'MPG~Weight*Model_Year')`

fit = Linear regression model: MPG ~ 1 + Weight*Model_Year Estimated Coefficients: Estimate SE ___________ __________ (Intercept) 37.399 2.1466 Weight -0.0058437 0.00061765 Model_Year_76 4.6903 2.8538 Model_Year_82 21.051 4.157 Weight:Model_Year_76 -0.00082009 0.00085468 Weight:Model_Year_82 -0.0050551 0.0015636 tStat pValue ________ __________ (Intercept) 17.423 2.8607e-30 Weight -9.4612 4.6077e-15 Model_Year_76 1.6435 0.10384 Model_Year_82 5.0641 2.2364e-06 Weight:Model_Year_76 -0.95953 0.33992 Weight:Model_Year_82 -3.2329 0.0017256 Number of observations: 94, Error degrees of freedom: 88 Root Mean Squared Error: 2.79 R-squared: 0.886, Adjusted R-Squared 0.88 F-statistic vs. constant model: 137, p-value = 5.79e-40

The regression output shows:

`fitlm`

recognizes`Model_Year`

as a nominal variable, and constructs the required indicator (dummy) variables. By default, the first level,`70`

, is the reference group (use`reorderlevels`

to change the reference group).The model specification,

`MPG~Weight*Model_Year`

, specifies the first-order terms for`Weight`

and`Model_Year`

, and all interactions.The model

= 0.886, meaning the variation in miles per gallon is reduced by 88.6% when you consider weight, model year, and their interactions.*R*^{2}The fitted model is

$$M\widehat{P}G=37.4-0.006Weight+4.7I[1976]+21.1I[1982]-0.0008Weight\times I[1976]-0.005Weight\times I[1982].$$

Thus, the estimated regression equations for the model years are as follows.

Model Year Predicted MPG Against Weight 1970 $$M\widehat{P}G=37.4-0.006Weight$$

1976 $$M\widehat{P}G=(37.4+4.7)-(0.006+0.0008)Weight$$

1982 $$M\widehat{P}G=(37.4+21.1)-(0.006+0.005)Weight$$

The relationship between `MPG`

and `Weight`

has
an increasingly negative slope as the model year increases.

Plot the data and fitted regression lines.

w = linspace(min(Weight),max(Weight)); figure() gscatter(Weight,MPG,Model_Year,'bgr','x.o') line(w,feval(fit,w,'70'),'Color','b','LineWidth',2) line(w,feval(fit,w,'76'),'Color','g','LineWidth',2) line(w,feval(fit,w,'82'),'Color','r','LineWidth',2) title('Fitted Regression Lines by Model Year')

Test for significant differences between the slopes. This is equivalent to testing the hypothesis

$$\begin{array}{l}{H}_{0}:{\beta}_{4}={\beta}_{5}=0\\ {H}_{A}:\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{\beta}_{i}\ne 0\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{for}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{at}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{least}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{one}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}i.\end{array}$$

anova(fit)

ans = SumSq DF MeanSq F pValue Weight 2050.2 1 2050.2 263.87 3.2055e-28 Model_Year 807.69 2 403.84 51.976 1.2494e-15 Weight:Model_Year 81.219 2 40.609 5.2266 0.0071637 Error 683.74 88 7.7698

`0.0072`

(from
the interaction row, `Weight:Model_Year`

), so the
null hypothesis is rejected at the 0.05 significance level. The value
of the test statistic is `5.2266`

. The numerator
degrees of freedom for the test is `2`

, which is
the number of coefficients in the null hypothesis.There is sufficient evidence that the slopes are not equal for all three model years.

`dataset`

| `fitlm`

| `nominal`

| `reorderlevels`

- Plot Data Grouped by Category
- Test Differences Between Category Means
- Summary Statistics Grouped by Category

Was this topic helpful?