| Contents | Index |
[x,y] = cordicpol2cart(theta,r)
[x,y] = cordicpol2cart(theta,r,niters)
[x,y] = cordicpol2cart(theta,r,Name,Value)
[x,y] = cordicpol2cart(theta,r,niters,Name,Value)
[x,y] = cordicpol2cart(theta,r) returns the Cartesian xy coordinates of r* e^(j*theta) using a CORDIC algorithm approximation.
[x,y] = cordicpol2cart(theta,r,niters) performs niters iterations of the algorithm.
[x,y] = cordicpol2cart(theta,r,Name,Value) scales the output depending on the Boolean value of b.
[x,y] = cordicpol2cart(theta,r,niters,Name,Value) specifies both the number of iterations and Name,Value pair for whether to scale the output.
Optional comma-separated pairs of Name,Value arguments, where Name is the argument name and Value is the corresponding value. Name must appear inside single quotes ('').
CORDIC is an acronym for COordinate Rotation DIgital Computer. The Givens rotation-based CORDIC algorithm is among one of the most hardware-efficient algorithms available because it requires only iterative shift-add operations (see [1], [2]) The CORDIC algorithm eliminates the need for explicit multipliers. Using CORDIC, you can calculate various functions, such as sine, cosine, arc sine, arc cosine, arc tangent, and vector magnitude. You can also use this algorithm for divide, square root, and hyperbolic, and logarithmic functions.
Increasing the number of CORDIC iterations can produce more accurate results, but doing so also increases the expense of the computation and adds latency.
Run the following code, and evaluate the accuracy of the CORDIC-based Polar-to-Cartesian conversion.
wrdLn = 16;
theta = fi(pi/3, 1, wrdLn);
u = fi( 2.0, 1, wrdLn);
fprintf('\n\nNITERS\tX\t\t ERROR\t LSBs\t\tY\t\t ERROR\t LSBs\n');
fprintf('------\t-------\t ------\t ----\t\t-------\t ------\t ----\n');
for niters = 1:(wrdLn - 1)
[x_ref, y_ref] = pol2cart(double(theta),double(u));
[x_fi, y_fi] = cordicpol2cart(theta, u, niters);
x_dbl = double(x_fi);
y_dbl = double(y_fi);
x_err = abs(x_dbl - x_ref);
y_err = abs(y_dbl - y_ref);
fprintf(' %d\t%1.4f\t %1.4f\t %1.1f\t\t%1.4f\t %1.4f\t %1.1f\n',niters,x_dbl,x_err,(x_err * pow2(x_fi.FractionLength)),y_dbl,y_err,(y_err * pow2(y_fi.FractionLength)));
end
fprintf('\n');
NITERS X ERROR LSBs Y ERROR LSBs
------ ------- ------ ---- ------- ------ ----
1 1.4142 0.4142 3392.8 1.4142 0.3178 2603.8
2 0.6324 0.3676 3011.2 1.8973 0.1653 1354.2
3 1.0737 0.0737 603.8 1.6873 0.0448 366.8
4 0.8561 0.1440 1179.2 1.8074 0.0753 617.2
5 0.9672 0.0329 269.2 1.7505 0.0185 151.2
6 1.0214 0.0213 174.8 1.7195 0.0126 102.8
7 0.9944 0.0056 46.2 1.7351 0.0031 25.2
8 1.0079 0.0079 64.8 1.7274 0.0046 37.8
9 1.0011 0.0011 8.8 1.7313 0.0007 5.8
10 0.9978 0.0022 18.2 1.7333 0.0012 10.2
11 0.9994 0.0006 5.2 1.7323 0.0003 2.2
12 1.0002 0.0002 1.8 1.7318 0.0002 1.8
13 0.9999 0.0002 1.2 1.7321 0.0000 0.2
14 0.9996 0.0004 3.2 1.7321 0.0000 0.2
15 0.9998 0.0003 2.2 1.7321 0.0000 0.2[1] Volder, J.E. "The CORDIC Trigonometric Computing Technique," IRE Transactions on Electronic Computers. Vol. EC-8, September 1959, pp. 330–334.
[2] Andraka, R. "A survey of CORDIC algorithm for FPGA based computers." Proceedings of the 1998 ACM/SIGDA sixth international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays. Feb. 22–24, 1998, pp. 191–200.
cordicrotate | cordicsincos | pol2cart

Learn how to apply early verification to your development process through these technical resources.
How much time do you spend on testing to ensure implementation meets system-level requirements?
| © 1984-2012- The MathWorks, Inc. - Site Help - Patents - Trademarks - Privacy Policy - Preventing Piracy - RSS |