Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Please click here

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

To view all translated materals including this page, select Japan from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

This section takes you through the features of wavelet 2-D true compression using the Wavelet Toolbox™ software.

For more information on the compression methods see Wavelet Compression for Images in the *Wavelet
Toolbox User's Guide*.

For more information on the main function available when using
command-line mode, see the `wcompress`

reference
pages.

Starting from a given image, the goal of the true compression is to minimize the length of the sequence of bits needed to represent it, while preserving information of acceptable quality. Wavelets contribute to effective solutions for this problem.

The complete chain of compression includes phases of quantization, coding and decoding in addition of the wavelet processing itself.

The purpose of this section is to show how to compress and uncompress a grayscale or truecolor image using various compression methods.

In this section, you'll learn to

Compress using global thresholding and Huffman encoding

Uncompress

Compress using progressive methods

Handle truecolor images

First load and display the grayscale image mask.

load mask; image(X) axis square; colormap(pink(255)) title('Original Image: mask')

A synthetic performance of the compression is given by the compression ratio and the Bit-Per-Pixel ratio which are equivalent.

The compression ratio CR means that the compressed image is stored using only CR% of the initial storage size.

The Bit-Per-Pixel ratio BPP gives the number of bits used to store one pixel of the image.

For a grayscale image, the initial BPP is 8 while for a truecolor image the initial BPP is 24 because 8 bits are used to encode each of the three colors (RGB color space).

The challenge of compression methods is to find the best compromise between a weak compression ratio and a good perceptual result.

Let us begin with a simple method cascading global coefficients
thresholding and Huffman encoding. We use the default wavelet *bior4.4* and
the default level which is the maximum possible level (see the `wmaxlev`

function) divided by 2.

The desired Bit-Per-Pixel ratio BPP is set to 0.5 and the compressed
image will be stored in the file named `'mask.wtc'`

.

meth = 'gbl_mmc_h'; % Method name option = 'c'; % 'c' stands for compression [CR,BPP] = wcompress(option,X,'mask.wtc',meth,'bpp',0.5) CR = 6.6925 BPP = 0.5354

The achieved Bit-Per-Pixel ratio is actually about 0.53 (closed to the desired one) for a compression ratio of 6.7%.

Let us uncompress the image retrieved from the file `'mask.wtc'`

and
compare it to the original image.

option = 'u'; % 'u' stands for uncompression Xc = wcompress(option,'mask.wtc'); colormap(pink(255)) subplot(1,2,1); image(X); axis square; title('Original Image') subplot(1,2,2); image(Xc); axis square; title('Compressed Image') xlabel({['Compression Ratio: ' num2str(CR,'%1.2f %%')], ... ['BPP: ' num2str(BPP,'%3.2f')]})

Let us now illustrate the use of progressive methods starting with the well known EZW algorithm using the Haar wavelet. The key parameter is the number of loops. Increasing it, leads to better recovery but worse compression ratio.

meth = 'ezw'; % Method name wname = 'haar'; % Wavelet name nbloop = 6; % Number of loops [CR,BPP] = wcompress('c',X,'mask.wtc',meth, ... 'maxloop',nbloop,'wname',wname); Xc = wcompress('u','mask.wtc'); colormap(pink(255)) subplot(1,2,1); image(X); axis square; title('Original Image') subplot(1,2,2); image(Xc); axis square; title('Compressed Image - 6 steps') xlabel({['Compression Ratio: ' num2str(CR,'%1.2f %%')], ... ['BPP: ' num2str(BPP,'%3.2f')]})

A too small number of steps (here 6) produces a very coarse compressed image. So let us examine a little better result for 9 steps and a satisfactory result for 12 steps.

[CR,BPP]= wcompress('c',X,'mask.wtc',meth,'maxloop',9, ... 'wname','haar'); Xc = wcompress('u','mask.wtc'); colormap(pink(255)) subplot(1,2,1); image(Xc); axis square; title('Compressed Image - 9 steps') xlabel({['Compression Ratio: ' num2str(CR,'%1.2f %%')],... ['BPP: ' num2str(BPP,'%3.2f')]}) [CR,BPP] = wcompress('c',X,'mask.wtc',meth,'maxloop',12, ... 'wname','haar'); Xc = wcompress('u','mask.wtc'); subplot(1,2,2); image(Xc); axis square; title('Compressed Image - 12 steps') xlabel({['Compression Ratio: ' num2str(CR,'%1.2f %%')],... ['BPP: ' num2str(BPP,'%3.2f')]})

As can be seen, the reached BPP ratio is about 0.92 when using 12 steps.

Let us try to improve it by using the wavelet *bior4.4* instead
of *haar* and looking at obtained results for steps
12 and 11.

[CR,BPP] = wcompress('c',X,'mask.wtc','ezw','maxloop',12, ... 'wname','bior4.4'); Xc = wcompress('u','mask.wtc'); colormap(pink(255)) subplot(1,2,1); image(Xc); axis square; title('Compressed Image - 12 steps - bior4.4') xlabel({['Compression Ratio: ' num2str(CR,'%1.2f %%')], ... ['BPP: ' num2str(BPP,'%3.2f')]}) [CR,BPP] = wcompress('c',X,'mask.wtc','ezw','maxloop',11, ... 'wname','bior4.4'); Xc = wcompress('u','mask.wtc'); subplot(1,2,2); image(Xc); axis square; title('Compressed Image - 11 steps - bior4.4') xlabel({['Compression Ratio: ' num2str(CR,'%1.2f %%')], ... ['BPP: ' num2str(BPP,'%3.2f')]})

Starting from the eleventh loop, the result can be considered satisfactory. The reached BPP ratio is now about 0.35. It can even be slightly improved by using a more recent method: SPIHT (Set Partitioning In Hierarchical Trees).

[CR,BPP] = wcompress('c',X,'mask.wtc','spiht','maxloop',12, ... 'wname','bior4.4'); Xc = wcompress('u','mask.wtc'); colormap(pink(255)) subplot(1,2,1); image(X); axis square; title('Original Image') subplot(1,2,2); image(Xc); axis square; title('Compressed Image - 12 steps - bior4.4') xlabel({['Compression Ratio: ' num2str(CR,'%1.2f %%')], ... ['BPP: ' num2str(BPP,'%3.2f')]}) [psnr,mse,maxerr,l2rat] = psnr_mse_maxerr(X,Xc) delete('mask.wtc')

The final compression ratio (2.8%) and the Bit-Per-Pixel ratio (0.23) are very satisfactory. Let us recall that the first ratio means that the compressed image is stored using only 2.8% of the initial storage size.

Finally, let us illustrate how to compress the `wpeppers.jpg`

truecolor
image. Truecolor images can be compressed along the same scheme as
the grayscale images by applying the same strategies to each of the
three color components.

The progressive compression method used is SPIHT (Set Partitioning In Hierarchical Trees) and the number of encoding loops is set to 12.

X = imread('wpeppers.jpg'); [CR,BPP] = wcompress('c',X,'wpeppers.wtc','spiht','maxloop',12); Xc = wcompress('u','wpeppers.wtc'); subplot(1,2,1); image(X); axis square; title('Original Image') subplot(1,2,2); image(Xc); axis square; title('Compressed Image - 12 steps - bior4.4') xlabel({['Compression Ratio: ' num2str(CR,'%1.2f %%')], ... ['BPP: ' num2str(BPP,'%3.2f')]}) delete('wpeppers.wtc')

The compression ratio (1.65%) and the Bit-Per-Pixel ratio (0.4) are very satisfactory while maintaining a good visual perception.

In this section, we explore the different methods for 2-D true compression, using the Wavelet Analyzer app.

Start the True Compression 2-D Tool.

From the MATLAB

^{®}prompt, type`waveletAnalyzer`

.The

**Wavelet Analyzer**appears. Click the**True Compression 2-D**item. The true compression tool for images appears.Load the image.

At the MATLAB command prompt, type

In theload mask;

**True Compression 2-D**tool, select**File**>**Import from Workspace**. When the**Import from Workspace**dialog box appears, select the`X`

variable. Click**OK**to import the data. The image appears at the top left of the window together with the gray level histogram just below.Perform a Wavelet Decomposition.

Accept the default wavelet

**bior4.4**and select**4**from the**Level**menu which is the maximum possible level divided by 2 and then click the**Decompose**button. After a pause for computation, the tool displays the wavelet approximation and details coefficients of the decomposition for the three directions, together with the histogram of the original coefficients.The peak of the bin containing zero illustrates the capability of wavelets to concentrate the image energy into a few nonzero coefficients.

Try a simple method.

Begin with a simple method cascading global coefficients thresholding and Huffman encoding.

Choose the

**GBL_MMC_H**option from the menu**Compression method**located at the top right of the**Compression Parameters**frame. For more information on the compression methods, see Wavelet Compression for Images in the*Wavelet Toolbox User's Guide*.Set the desired Bit-Per-Pixel ratio to

**0.5**.Values of the other parameters are automatically updated. Note that these values are only approximations of the true performances since the quantization step cannot be exactly predicted without performing it. Click the

**Compress**button.Synthetic performance is given by the compression ratio and the computed Bit-Per-Pixel (BPP). This last one is actually about 0.53 (close to the desired one 0.5) for a compression ratio of 6.7%.

The compressed image, at the bottom left, can be compared with the original image.

The result is satisfactory but a better compromise between compression ratio and visual quality can be obtained using more sophisticated true compression which combines the thresholding and quantization steps.

Compress using a first progressive method: EZW.

Let us now illustrate the use of progressive methods starting with the well known EZW algorithm. Let us start by selecting the wavelet

**haar**from the**Wavelet**menu and select**8**from the**Level**menu. Then click the**Decompose**button.Choose the

**EZW**option from the menu**Compression method**. The key parameter is the number of loops: increasing it leads to a better recovery but worse compression ratio. From the**Nb. Encoding Loops**menu, set the number of encoding loops to**6**, which is a small value. Click the**Compress**button.Refine the result by increasing the number of loops.

Too few steps produce a very coarse compressed image. So let us examine a little better result for

**9**steps. Set the number of encoding loops to 9 and click the**Compress**button.As can be seen, the result is better but not satisfactory, both by visual inspection and by calculating the Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) which is less than 30.

Now try a large enough number of steps to get a satisfactory result. Set the number of encoding loops to

**12**and click the**Compress**button.The result is now acceptable. But for 12 steps, we attain a Bit-Per-Pixel ratio about 0.92.

Get better compression performance by changing the wavelet and selecting the best adapted number of loops.

Let us try to improve the compression performance by changing the wavelet: select

**bior4.4**instead of**haar**and then click the**Decompose**button.In order to select the number of loops, the Wavelet Analyzer app tool allows you to examine the successive results obtained by this kind of stepwise procedure. Set the number of encoding loops at a large value, for example

**13**, and click the**Show Compression Steps**button. Moreover you could execute the procedure stepwise by clicking the**Stepwise**button.Then, click the

**Compress**button. Thirteen progressively more finely compressed images appear, and you can then select visually a convenient value for the number of loops. A satisfactory result seems to be obtained after 11 loops. So, you can set the number of encoding loops to**11**and click the**Compress**button.The reached BPP ratio is now about 0.35 which is commonly considered a very satisfactory result. Nevertheless, it can be slightly improved by using a more recent method SPIHT (Set Partitioning In Hierarchical Trees).

Obtain a final compressed image by using a third method.

Choose the

**SPIHT**option from the menu**Compression method**, set the number of encoding loops to**12**, and click the**Compress**button.The final compression ratio and the Bit-Per-Pixel ratio are very satisfactory: 2.8% and 0.22. Let us recall that the first ratio means that the compressed image is stored using only 2.8% of the initial storage size.

Handle truecolor images.

Finally, let us illustrate how to compress truecolor images. The truecolor images can be compressed along the same scheme by applying the same strategies to each of the three-color components.

From

the

**File**menu, choose the**Load Image**option and select the**Matlab Supported Formats**item.When the

**Load Image**dialog box appears, select the MAT-file`wpeppers.jpg`

which should reside in the MATLAB folder`toolbox/wavelet/wavelet`

.Click the

**OK**button. A window appears asking you if you want to consider the loaded image as a truecolor one. Click the**Yes**button. Accept the defaults for wavelet and decomposition level menus and then click the**Decompose**button.Then, accept the default compression method

**SPIHT**and set the number of encoding loops to**12.**Click the**Compress**button.The compression ratio and Bit-Per-Pixel (BPP) ratio are very satisfactory: 1.65% and 0.4 together with a very good perceptual result.

Inspect the wavelet tree.

For both grayscale and truecolor images, more insight on the multiresolution structure of the compressed image can be retrieved by clicking the

**Inspect Wavelet Trees**button and then on the various active menus available from the displayed tree.

You can save the compressed image to disk in the current folder with a name of your choice.

The Wavelet
Toolbox compression tools can create a file
using either one of the Matlab Supported Format types or a specific
format which can be recognized by the extension of the file: **wtc** (Wavelet
Toolbox Compressed).

To save the above compressed image, use the menu option **File > Save Compressed Image > Wavelet Toolbox Compressed
Image**. A dialog box appears that lets you specify a folder
and filename for storing the image. Of course, the use of the **wtc** format requires you to uncompress the stored
image using the Wavelet
Toolbox true compression tools.

Was this topic helpful?