The documentation for inv says:
A frequent misuse of inv arises when solving the system of linear equations Ax = b. One way to solve this is with x = inv(A)*b. A better way, from both an execution time and numerical accuracy standpoint, is to use the matrix division operator x = A\b.
The above taken for granted, is it nevertheless reasonable to precalculate invA = inv(A) in front of a loop containing (A\Xi), especially one that necessarily sequential?
Play games and win prizes!Learn more