Inverse stationary wavelet transform (iswt) slow compared to stationary wavelet transform?

2 views (last 30 days)
Tim
Tim on 17 Aug 2015
I ran an analysis of my code using profile, and found that iswt takes significantly longer than the forward swt (more than a factor of 10). Bior3.3 was the wavelet used, and there were 8 decomposition levels. Any ideas on what accounts for the difference in execution time?

Sign in to answer this question.

Answers (0)

Categories

Find more on Continuous Wavelet Transforms in Help Center and File Exchange

Tags

Products

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!