Hi all,
Consider the vectors: A of size; s x 4 B of size; 4 x s
Now, I am only interested in the product A(i,:)*B(:,i) of size s x 1
for i=1,..,s. I.e. only the row times the collumn with the same index.
The solution I found myself is: diag(A*B);
But I think there must be a faster solution, since I calculate many useless matrix elements if s>>4.
Do you guys have a suggestion?
Hi,
don't know if it is really more efficient, give it a try:
x = dot(A',B)'
Titus
t=linspace(0,1,100);
tf=[t'.^3 t'.^2 t' ones(size(t'))];
M=[-1 3 -3 1; 3 -6 3 0 ; -3 0 3 0; 1 4 1 0]; %Standard form for matrix uniform cubic spline evaluation
P=randn(4,length(t));
tic; x = 1/6*diag(tf*M*P); toc
Elapsed time is 0.000065 seconds.
tic; y = 1/6*dot((tf*M)',P)'; toc
Elapsed time is 0.002589 seconds.
Hence, too slow.
Maybe I am missing something here, but it seems like you already have a solution ...
x = zeros(s, 1) for i = 1:s x(i) = A(i, :)*B(i, :); end
I am posting this as a separate answer. First when using timing, MATLAB has a hard time timing things that take only 0.000065 seconds, so you should put things in a loop. Second, The size of the matrices need to be established before discounting an answer as too slow.
t=linspace(0,1,1e4); tf=[t'.^3 t'.^2 t' ones(size(t'))]; M=[-1 3 -3 1; 3 -6 3 0 ; -3 0 3 0; 1 4 1 0]; %Standard form for matrix uniform cubic spline evaluation P=randn(4,length(t));
tic; for ii = 1:10 x = diag(tf*M*P); end; toc
tic; for ii = 1:10 x = sum((tf*M)'.*P)'; end; toc
tic; for ii = 1:10 x = dot((tf*M)', P)'; end; toc
tic;
s = length(t);
x = zeros(s, 1);
A = (tf*M);
B = P;
for ii = 1:10
for i = 1:s
x(i) = A(i, :)*B(:, i);
end
end
toc
On my machine I get:
with the "too slow" loop being an order of magnitude faster than diag. With a large s, there is essentially no difference between the dot and sum method. For your example matrix sizes, the error checking in dot takes a significant portion of the time.
To really optimize your code you want to think about the order in which operations are occurring and memory access.
http://undocumentedmatlab.com/blog/matrix-processing-performance/
Thanks for the input! I, however, do not get how you would get a +7 second calculation time for the diag() function.
Anyway, for s>>4 diag() is indeed very slow and sum or dot are much much faster.
0 Comments