I know that Mathworks pays a lot of attention to this stuff, so I am wondering why the expression
is 0. Returning a NaN here seems more logical to me.
At the bottom of the doc page:
The min function ignores NaNs
If you initialize the result to inf, and then loop testing whether the current value is less than the result and replace the result if it is, then since NaN < any number is false, the result will never get replaced with NaN. You would have to add special code to return NaN in such a case.
Given the behavior of MIN, I find it odd that there is a NANMIN function.
NaN is considered undefined, so undefined is ignored by most functions (0/0 will be resulted in NaN which is basically undefined but any number divided by 0, say 4/0, will result in inf). However, the question is why Matlab has decided to treat NaNs in a certain way in some functions, e.g., sort function will always arrange NaNs at the top end (A to Z mode). I guess Matlab has just decided to adopt some rules to handle exceptions.