Discover MakerZone

MATLAB and Simulink resources for Arduino, LEGO, and Raspberry Pi

Learn more

Discover what MATLAB® can do for your career.

Opportunities for recent engineering grads.

Apply Today

Stable model, but results show instability

Asked by Kiran Sagar on 30 Dec 2012

i have recently made a simulink model of a mechanical system, though complex in nature, but basically it is a second order ODE.

i think that my plant model is stable statically, and neutrally stable dynamically. yet i am getting results showing dynamic instability. i am thinking about possible reasons for this.

kindly clarify whether numerical scheme can lead to dynamic instability of a neutrally stable plant.

configuration parameters: variable step, step size- auto, tolerances- auto.

1 Comment

Azzi Abdelmalek on 30 Dec 2012

Can you post your model?

Kiran Sagar


No products are associated with this question.

2 Answers

Answer by Matt J on 30 Dec 2012
Edited by Matt J on 30 Dec 2012
Accepted answer

Because a neutrally stable system (as I know the term) is on the threshold of instability, it definitely makes sense that numerical inaccuracies in the implementation of the plant can render it unstable.

Consider a system that simply multiplies its input by some constant


For c=1, it is neutrally stable at all inputs, x, whereas for any c>1, it is unstable. If c was the output of approximate calculations, then even though c may supposed to be 1 (stable), imprecision in the calculations can make it >1, i.e., unstable.


Matt J
Answer by Jan Simon on 30 Dec 2012
Edited by Jan Simon on 30 Dec 2012

Due to round-off errors and local discretization error the numerical and mathematical behavior is expected to be different. A simply example is the differential quotient as approximation of the derivative:

d = (f(x+h) - f(x)) / h;

If h is large, the linearization error is large. If h is small, the difference of the function evaluations can be such tiny, that the cancellation error dominates the result. Therefore the numerically determined derivative has a limited accuracy only, as a rule of thumb in the magnitude of sqrt(eps). Equivalent arguments appear for the two-sided differential quotient and any other scheme also.

Because all numerical ODE solvers are based on evaluating linearized derivatives, the limited accuracy is a fundamental effect, which cannot be avoided. Reducing the relative and absolute tolerances helps, but only until a certain limit, when the cancellation error dominates the linearization error and the accumulation of the round-off errors gets more important due to the higher number of steps.

However, an unexpected instability can be caused by a modelling error also. Did you validate the model exhaustively? How did you check the dynamic instability? Is the model continuously differentiable (I ask this, because in the past I saw so many users in this forum, who used integrands with discontinuities)?


Jan Simon

Contact us