Why is this graph just a normal graph and not a LOGLOG plot?

h={.2 .1 .05 .025 .0125 .00625 .003125 .0015625 .00078125};

ha={.2 .1 .05 .025 .0125 .00625 .003125 .0015625 .00078125};

h1={.2 .1 .05 .025 .0125 .00625 .003125 .0015625 .00078125};

ha1={.04 .01 .0025 .000625 .00015625 .0000390625 .000009765625 .00000244140625 .00000061035156};

h2={.2 .1 .05 .025 .0125 .00625 .003125 .0015625 .00078125};

ha2={ (.2^4) (.1^4) (.05^4) (.025^4) (.0125^4) (.00625^4) (.003125^4) (.0015625^4) (.00078125^4)};

hold on;

loglog([h{:}], [ha{:}],'-b', [h1{:}], [ha1{:}], '-r', [h2{:}], [ha2{:}], '-g');

Answer 1

[Walter Roberson]

When you use "hold on", you lock in log vs linear for your axes. Unless you have Very Good Reasons, your "hold on" should be after your loglog() call.