MATLAB and Simulink resources for Arduino, LEGO, and Raspberry Pi

Learn moreOpportunities for recent engineering grads.

Apply Today
Asked by Eric Sampson on 1 May 2013

Hi, I don't know what the right terminology is, but I'd like to know if there is a nice vectorized syntax for calculating a 'chunked' average/max/etc over a vector. Basically for any given average/max/etc type function, I'd like to do something like this:

for chunk = 1:num_chunks chunked_max(chunk) = average(input(chunk_start_index(chunk):chunk_end_index(chunk))); end

Thanks for your thoughts!

*No products are associated with this question.*

Answer by Image Analyst on 1 May 2013

Accepted answer

Take your vector and reshape it into a 2D matrix and then call mean(). Or you could use blocproc(). Here's a little demo for you:

% Generate sample data. m = randi(9, [1, 24]) [mRows mCols] = size(m); % Reshape it into a 2D matrix. % Turn into a row vector if necessary. numberOfRows = 8; numberOfColumns = 3; m2 = reshape(m(:), [numberOfRows, numberOfColumns]) % IMPORTANT: the (:) helps make sure it doesn't matter if m % is a row vector or a column vector to start with.

% Now take the mean within each columns, % going down the rows to get the mean, % before moving over to the next column. theMeans = mean(m2, 1)

% ALTERNATE METHOD USING blocproc() meanFilterFunction = @(theBlockStructure) mean(theBlockStructure.data(:)); blockSize = [1 numberOfRows]; theMeansBP = blockproc(m, blockSize, meanFilterFunction)

Sample data in the command window:

m = 6 2 6 8 5 6 8 3 6 2 5 8 9 5 3 6 9 5 9 2 2 3 4 4 m2 = 6 6 9 2 2 5 6 5 9 8 8 2 5 9 2 6 5 3 8 3 4 3 6 4 theMeans = 5.5 5.5 4.75 theMeansBP = 5.5 5.5 4.75

Eric Sampson on 1 May 2013

Brilliant example of 'out of the box' thinking, I neglected to consider reshaping the original matrix! If the desired numberOfColumns*numberOfRows ~= numel(m), is there a nice syntax to tell MATLAB to fill the 'leftover' entries with NaNs?

Image Analyst on 1 May 2013

Yeah, but not so out of the box. This is asked so often that it really should be in the FAQ and I just gave the standard answer. Well, *maybe a little better* than the standard since my code works for column vectors as well as row vectors and many people don't prepare for that so their code only works for one direction or the other. But I wasn't the first one to think of this approach, though it is somewhat clever. Even another approach is to use conv() to take a moving average where the box slides along one element at a time, and then subsample it.

## 0 Comments