Asked by Amir
on 18 May 2013

i m trying to optimize the following function

z=-(r)*(L/M)*(1-(((L/M).^x(1))/((gamma(x(1)+1))*symsum(((L/M).^p)/(gamma(p+1)),p,0,x(1)))))+c*x(1);

with syms p r=2; L=10; M=2; c=1;

and getting the following error

??? Error using ==> mupadmex Error in MuPAD command: Illegal range [sum::sum]

can anybody help me how can i set the upper limit as variable in summation??

*No products are associated with this question.*

Answer by Roger Stafford
on 20 May 2013

Edited by Roger Stafford
on 20 May 2013

In the expression

symsum((L/M)^p/gamma(p+1),p,0,n)

for p an integer ranging from 0 to n it is the sum of the first n+1 terms in the infinite power series expansion for the exponential function exp(L/M). It is extremely doubtful that there exists any known "closed form" for this finite summation in terms of a general n. In integral calculus, there are some integrals for which there are known closed forms (which one can usually find listed in integral tables) but many more for which none are known. In an analogous way there are finite summations for which there are known closed forms such as

symsum(p^2,p,1,n) = n*(n+1)*(2*n+1)/6

and many more for which none are known. As I say, it is very likely the summation you describe belongs to that latter category. One should therefore not blame Mupad for not finding it.

Walter Roberson
on 20 May 2013

Answer by Amir
on 20 May 2013

i m not getting what is the issue? if i use the same expression without symsum(..), i'm being returned with the optimized values of function 'z' and decision variable 'x', which shows that code is working properly but with the induction of summation with upper bound as decision variable, it generates the error! is there any other way to induce the following summation here???

"∑ p=0 to x {(L/M)^p/p!}"

where xϵ{1,100}

Roger Stafford
on 20 May 2013

Walter Roberson
on 20 May 2013

Opportunities for recent engineering grads.

## 6 Comments

## Walter Roberson (view profile)

Direct link to this comment:http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/76236#comment_149636

You have not shown how you define x ?

## Amir (view profile)

Direct link to this comment:http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/76236#comment_149664

it is basically a part of algo where we want to find the best value of function and x(1). range of x(1) is defined within (1,100)

## Amir (view profile)

Direct link to this comment:http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/76236#comment_149667

if i give some numeric value instead of x(1), then it runs. according to my observation it takes numeric value in this format. is there anyother way to define summation with upper limit as free variable??

## Walter Roberson (view profile)

Direct link to this comment:http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/76236#comment_149698

Please show the statement you used to initialize x and to set the value of x(1)

## Amir (view profile)

Direct link to this comment:http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/76236#comment_149723

well! em using the algo available at web

http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/29693-firefly-algorithm/content/fa_ndim.m

and trying to implement it for my objective function.

whole format is as follows;

## Walter Roberson (view profile)

Direct link to this comment:http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/76236#comment_149778

The code you show never has "x" as a symbolic variable, so your upper bound is always numeric. I need to see the version of the code that has the error.