the cyclist

View profile information

Personal Profile

Researcher and Director of Data Science at PatientsLikeMe.com; MATLAB evangelist.

Professional Interests

Predictive modeling, statistics

36Rank
9Badges
3115Score

the cyclist submitted a Comment to Solution 214423

This solution only tests for divisibility by 9, not whether the number is a Kaprekar number.

on 9 Mar 2013

the cyclist submitted a Comment to Solution 27245

Added to test suite to eliminate this "solution".

on 9 Mar 2013

the cyclist submitted Solution 214704 to Problem 151. Magic!

on 8 Mar 2013

the cyclist submitted Solution 214703 to Problem 151. Magic!

on 8 Mar 2013

the cyclist submitted Solution 214702 to Problem 151. Magic!

on 8 Mar 2013

the cyclist submitted Solution 214701 to Problem 151. Magic!

on 8 Mar 2013

the cyclist submitted a Comment to Problem 151. Magic!

The MATLAB command magic(2), although it does produce output, is not a magic square, according to the definition. (There is no 2x2 magic square.)

on 8 Mar 2013

the cyclist submitted a Comment to Problem 151. Magic!

I was not notified about some of the older comments, so was unaware of some of the weaknesses of the test suite, and the "gamed" solutions. I have substantially improved the test suite.

on 8 Mar 2013

the cyclist submitted a Comment to Problem 162. High school cafeteria

I somehow Alfonso's older comment until I saw Tom's newer one. Alfonso: I've added a non-sorted test sample, and had the problem rescored. Tom: 1 is neither prime nor composite. I've added instructions on how to handle that.

on 27 Feb 2013

the cyclist submitted a Comment to Solution 179240

It looks like your solution uses the symbolic math toolbox. I am assuming that that is not available to Cody solutions.

on 19 Dec 2012

the cyclist submitted a Comment to Solution 177085

@sea knowledge: The solution to this problem requires some knowledge that is commonly held in the geek community. The problem title and the template solution have some hints.

on 14 Dec 2012

the cyclist submitted a Comment to Solution 161954

I added additional cases to the test suite, so this attempted solution is incorrect now.

on 1 Dec 2012