Soccer Infinite Teams

soccer with Inf teams

Description

Program show way of the winner team. Who is second winner team? Program don’t show this, don’t show classification. Future versions will show classification. In the final game (first game of the program) we’ve two teams: team1 and team2. If team1 is winner then is first in the classification but team2 isn’t second classificated because is necessary to play team3 (defeated to team1 in the final–1 match) vs team2: if team2 is winner with team3 then is 2° but if team3 is winner then team3 is 2°. Future versions will say this. In this version is possible to play forever because you are the stop of game and you can to see way of the winner team in an inestimable time: is an inverse logic, possible because you are an Infinite-Point-of-Half. Program is built with 1=2 strategy where 1 is, with soccer-interpretation, linear movement of the ball; this movement (line, trajectory) is possible because exist plane 2D and plane have horizontal and vertical; to speak of circonference (close line) is the same (contemporaneous) to speak of circle (open plane): Infinite teams are Infinite/2 of time, and Infinite/2 of space is the plane, the ball, the all-inanimated; Infinite/2 of space is Infinite/4 horizontal and Infinite/4 vertical: in this way Infinite/2 of time is Infinite/4 horizontal or Infinite/4 vertical: this formula is possibility to play games because Infinite/2 of time is trajectory of ball in movement on the plane and Infinite is spacetime 3D. Infinite is a number if It (Him) is finite and It (Him) is constantly finite because present is Point-of-Half. To go back, in a tourney with Inf teams, is to say “goooool” when ball is inside my goal (door). Point of Half is present to permit to obtain a finite-number of Infinite. Champions League is an example of Constantly Life in the Point of Half: otherwise isn’t possible to play soccer. Play the game! Happy pastime!!
http://spacelife.brinkster.net/sit.aspx
http://spacelife.brinkster.net/sit.htm
http://spacelife.brinkster.net/sit2.htm

• MATLAB release: MATLAB 6.1 (R12.1)
• Other Files: license.txt, ; Soccer_Infinite_Teams.m

[J x@y.z]

spam, please remove

[John D'Errico]

Spam. The same crap as always from Marco.

[Ponce de Leon]

Hmm. Two reviews but zero downloads. How can you be sure that this spam spewing troll hasn't suddenly come up with something earth-shattering? Perhaps Marco has developed a reputation?

[John D'Errico]

"Pound de Leon" is in error. It takes a few minutes for the download counter to update.

[Marco Pittaluga]

Eheh... also I am to able to put one star and to write spitting... program isn’t only a game, is also a game, a simulation of soccer, but is idea force of the program... think to idea, is possible to build more soccer with this strategy... and Ponce de Leon isn’t in error: 2 reviews and 0 download after few minutes

[Ponce de Leon]

Yes, its a delayed update. My error.

[Ken Eaton]

spam

[Bored Rat Saggy Dave]

Worse than trash. Denigrates the entire purpose of the File Exchange.

[Marco Pittaluga]

You denigrate File Exchange and Matlab in general, not I

[John D'Errico]

Marco fails to understand that reviews get posted IMMEDIATELY. But for some reason, the number of downloads takes sometimes quite a few minutes to update. I downloaded his code. It took no time at all to recognize the spam for what it was. I posted my review. I'll do it again and in more detail if he would like me to do so.

This is a word salad. A pretentious, useless hash of crapola. A terrible, amateurish coding style. It gives no help when you use the help facility. No H1 line, although why anybody would want to find this code is beyond me.

An example of the crap offered in this is found in this line:

% 2 = 2*Inf --> Inf = 1

Sorry, but this is not a valid mathematical statement. The last time I checked, 2 was not equal to 2*inf. MATLAB itself agrees with my statement.

2 == 2*inf
ans =
     0

Or, perhaps Marco really did mean to write it this way:

2 = 2*inf
??? 2 = 2*inf
      |
Error: The expression to the left of the equals sign is not a valid target for an assignment.

Sorry, but this is childish dreck. Marco spends an inordinate amount of time building dreck, but pure dreck it is.

[Marco Pittaluga]

In the equation 2=2*Inf is 2=2 if Inf=1... if is not a valid mathematical statement then 2 is not 2... but Inf is 1, also 1........... few minutes to update... isn’t problem... is possible to write also without download... number of downloads takes few minutes in the page of all files, not in my personal page-profile... maybe... isn’t important... important is to speak... mathematics to be in need of help... why 2=2*Inf --> Inf=1 is not valid ? I don’t understanding... to write X=1 is the same thing to write Inf=1... to write X=1 is possibility of 2=2 because there are Inf ways inside instruction X=1... one is content in X with X equal to Inf... Inf is not been understand... Inf, in the program, is not only a quantity to Inf distance from 1 but is also a quantity in the half, and half is now... with dynamic time interpretation (123456789...Inf) is impossible to arrive to Inf... i’ll select enter in the Inf time and i’ll not arrive to Inf... program is with point of half... Inf is in the half... with dynamic time isn’t possible to arrive to Inf because there is a point of separation from finite-number to Inf... if i write 1 2 3 4 and stop, there is 4.5 how point of half and 5 is Inf with other numbers... dynamic time is line of numbers, point of half is a plane of numbers, without reference; point of half is point of intersection from up to down and from down to up... if action is in the verse of clock then reaction is in the other verse (anti-clock)... double verse, constantly... circle is 360° and all (all is all) is a circle... 180° in a verse and 180° in anti-verse to permit to obtain point of half in 90=90 because 180+180=360 is 90... 90° in a verse and 90° in anti-verse to permit to obtain point of half in 45 because 90+90=180 is 45... when i speak of 90° is necessary to speak also of 270° in the other verse... 1=4...90°=360°... point of half is equilibrium of the system... only 90° in a verse of clock is dynamic time... dynamic time ok, but also static time... if you think at the program how dynamic time you’ll not arrive to Inf, but if you think at the program how Inf-now, Inf-point-of-half then Inf is now, in the half

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Belligerent and combative, this author meets every meaningful comment with an absurd diatribe consisting mostly of invalid mathematical concepts. Once in awhile you run into a complete nut online. While our community has been relatively peaceful and open we now have a no-kidding troll stinking up the FEX. I propose that from this point forward all rating of Marco's work should contain no written comment, merely a numeric rating if you must rate. Avoiding these comment interchanges with him is a well accepted way of dealing with such types. He might just go away if he cannot gain attention here.

[Duane Hanselman]

I concur with The Central Scrutinizer.

[John D'Errico]

Yes. CS makes an excellent point. From now on, I will check the content of anything Marco posts, but my review will be direct and purely numeric. I'd recommend others use the same style of response to these submissions.

[not me]

 

[ti ger]

 

[AB CD]

 

[E. Nuff]

Cheating on downloads:
http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFileList.do?objectType=fileexchange&orderBy=downloads&srt4=0
Boasting about it on blog:
http://blog.libero.it/PXlab/view.php?reset=1&id=PXlab

[@a Loss]

 

[w s]

 

[Marco Pittaluga]

Time to time... truth is write... i haven’t problems... put one star, write bad opinions, write with my name... there isn’t problem... truth is write... liking is fancy... kindly...

[troll waste]

troll waste

[Out Side]

 

[Marco Pittaluga]

Envy... little rabbit... you haven’t courage to write with your name... shame... truth is write... eheh

[John D'Errico]

This is CRAP. But Marco rates his own code a 5. This makes it doubly CRAP.

[V. Poor]

Poor.

[Marco Pittaluga]

PXLab: In realtà, lo ammetto che i miei programmi sono infantile e che io sia incompetente. Vi prego di inviarmi il sanatorio mentale in modo che io possa imparare a controllare le mie esorta a scrivere cattivi programmi. Grazie! Marco Pittaluga

[Marco Pittaluga]

You don’t know your life and life-mechanism. You write with my name but are you. Understanding? All your words are you, not me, you speak of you, you say thing of you. With my name. But are you, not me. Eheh!

[Dumb & Dumber]

Even poor is too much credit for this laMe file. My grandma has much more programming skills when she programs her DVD-recorder! Marco, you are a disgrace to the digital era.

[Marco Pittaluga]

Great software! Awesome graphics! I really kick ass. I Matlab is America...I am president Bush. I love me!

[alain boyer]

 

[Hal 9000]

 

[alexia lavadens]

 

[M P]

 

[V. Poor]

Poor.

[pitta]

 

[Brian Amerika]

 

[James]

 

[C]

 

[Ripley]

 

[Bishop]

 

[newt]

 

[Hudson]