01 transition: double model

breath-transition and current-transition

Description

3 programs:
breath, current, breath and current
---
Breath sequence
0 inhaltaion 1
180°
0 exhalation 1
180°
0 inhalation 1
180°
0 ...
---
Current sequence
0 forward 1 forward 0 forward 1 ...
---
Breath matrix is 28881x28881. Logical structure of the program is a vector of 19 elements: each 76 steps all elements is been utilized in each direction (external or internal); 4 phases of exhalation and 4 phases of inhalation for each circuitation; points selection is associable at the parallel function (from only one letter to 19 letters of possible vocalization) and the double-phase loops selection is associable at the serial function of the time.
---
Current matrix is 39x39: one element is margin; 1521 = 760 reds + 760 blues + center; start-center is red and blue, isn't red and isn't blue: absolute reference; current is a double point: right and left, with right in double phase; reds + blues = right current; reds = right current up; blues = right current down; start-center = left current (reference).
---
Breath and Current
start is zero center
breath is plane 2D
current is line 1D with movement-point;
close line is plane 2D;
circuitation: thick of the plane
breath:
from 0 to 1 in 76 steps,
180° inversion,
from 0 to 1 in 76 steps,
180° inversion ...
current:
from 0 to 1 in N steps,
from 1 to 0 in X steps, ...
breath --> space: 2
current --> time: 1

• MATLAB release: MATLAB 6.1 (R12.1)

[Ken Eaton]

You continuously prove over and over what a troll you are Marco. Giving you constructive criticism doesn't work... ignoring you doesn't work... laughing at you doesn't work. And now whenever anyone makes any comments you don't like, you start posting one-star ratings and gibberish on their legitimate FEX submissions. I at least download and try out your code before deeming it trash, but I doubt you even downloaded a single one of my submissions before you rated it. If you had, you would have seen what real legitimate MATLAB code looks like.

What I find funny is that you actually believe that your input is valued. If I were to see you posting one-star ratings on people's code, I would assume that it must be very good code... that's how laughable and worthless your judgment is.

So go ahead and keep posting one-star ratings, jackass. You're only proving me right.

[V. Poor]

Poor programming, indecipherable description, flawed premise. Evidently TMW isn't going to allow any critical reviews of these programs. Nice censorship.

[Hal 9000]

 

[M P]

 

[V. Poor]

Poor.

[pitta]

 

[James]

 

[C]

 

[Ripley]

 

[Bishop]

 

[newt]

 

[Hudson]