House Triple Point

Triple point of current with constant unitary velocity.

Description

This program is basis of my neural model: I’ve considerated current with 3 points; one point is reference and one point is a double function: up and down. Matrix-priority is a cube of dimension 19^3. When the software is running is important to think at the point of half (10,10,10) like reference position: the user is in the point of half, in the center of the cube and the cube is a brain-box. Are possible random-pc executions or executions with input. Hours are space, minutes and seconds are time. Is an analysis of the cube in coincidence with another matrix. Is also a color solution of 3 points.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge the following in the creation of this submission:
CUBE, PointLineColor, N
This submission has inspired the following:
CUBE, MIB: physics virtualizations

• MATLAB release: MATLAB 6.1 (R12.1)
• Other Files: HouseTriplePoint.m, ; license.txt

[Hal C]

As usual, the description is incomprehensible. I even looked at the author's blog pages, and those are even more cryptic and confusing. Here's an example of what I found:

NaN = Inf & N = inf --> Inf + inf = 1 --> NaN + N = 1 --> NaN = 0

NaN = Inf & N = inf --> Inf * inf = 0 --> NaN * N = 0 --> N = 0

Inf * inf = ( Inf + inf ) / 2 --> 0 = 0.5

This is absolute nonsense.

It also begs the obvious question: if this author already has a blog where he posts inordinate amounts of rambling triviality, why does he need to also post here?

[Marco P]

you haven't write all... you've write a sector of NaN_value.m ... isn't non-sense

[V. Poor]

Upon reviewing this code I encountered hundreds of lines of meaningless enumeration and indexing in incomprehensible loops. The function accepts no input and produces no output. The arithmetic gymnastics within seem to have no particular purpose. The author attempts to reference several previous flawed ideas as though they will adequately explain this mess. The obsession with simplistic arithmetic concepts is tedious and some of it is simply incorrect. Just bad programming with silly ideas behind it.

[Marco P]

tz tz... programs are numbers... in 3 minutes certainly isn't possible to understand a work of years... there isn't error

[V. Poor]

"programs are numbers"... nonsense

"in 3 minutes certainly isn't possible to understand a work of years"... I rather think this took hours for you to paste together from material on your blog.

"there isn't error"... Yes, there are errors IMO

[Marco P]

there isn’t error = there aren’t errors ... bla bla bla... you say say say... but don’t say where is error... there are people to understanding me... you no... problem of you... bla bla bla... in a bad way... your words aren’t to speak

[V. Poor]

I'm very sorry but my personal opinion is that your program is full of errors and is based upon incorrect math concepts regarding NaN and Inf. My review will stand. If you have it removed I will simply restore it even if I have to use a proxy server. The review and subsequent comments are compliant with FEX policy and I expect them to remain in place. I use an alias due to your propensity to post retaliatory ratings against those who dare to comment on your work.

[Marco P]

You have your opinion and I have my opinion... but your words aren’t to speak of the program, are a judgement... a functional program is a good program, always... what is this program? To speak, to say... but there are way and way... i said: my models are an interpretation without relativity, a different way of the light-mechanism, an antigravity model and an alternative proposal to Pitagora’s model... What do you want from a program? Isn’t possible to understand me in 3 minutes... there isn’t error, program is functionally ok

[V. Poor]

I must say that it is rather unseemly for you to rate your own program. Your habit of rebutting every comment is not helping you either. The comments stand. They represent my opinion. Others may think this is great work. Let them come forward and rate accordingly.

[Marco P]

and my programs are me

[V. Poor]

"and my programs are me"

I'm not denigrating your language skills but you might benefit from a better translator. If find that the google translator is a little better than some of the others. Might help with your descriptions and comments.

[Marco P]

program live because i live... my existenz is possibility of the program-existenz... i said this

[Hal C]

To V. Poor,

As far as using the google translator to make the author's descriptions/comments better, that's not likely. I used google translator on his blog pages and it was still incomprehensible. I tend to think it's more a problem with the author's capacity for reason (or lack thereof) as opposed to a language barrier.

[P. M.]

inutile, molto rumore circa nulla, programmazione incompetente, cattiva, immondizia, indifeso spazzatura, pretenzioso, assurdo, sciocco

[V. Poor]

"program live because i live... my existenz is possibility of the program-existenz... i said this" Yes, you've said this. The problem is that nobody perceives any meaning in it. If folks can't make sense out of such a phrase then it falls into the category of nonsense. In a place full of scientists, mathmeticians and engineers you are likely going to encounter some difficulty with such nonsense-speak. It just isn't going to fly here.

[Orcam Agullatip]

fprintf("This")
fprintf("is")
fprintf("obsolete")
fprintf("Marco")
fprintf("Can't")
fprintf("You")
fprintf("Just")
fprintf("give up!")

[w s]

Marco, why am I (you) necessarily in point of half. Can I not be somewhere else. Please give further explanation.

[Marco Pittaluga]

Oh, this is good... I (You) in the point of half of the cube because I’m (You are) in the half of me (of You). Perception in the half of her-self... point of half (10,10,10) is reference... there are two points: future point and past point... are choice-point and inverse point... from choice point (future) and past point (inverse point with point of half like point of simmetry) there is a distance and point (10,10,10) is in the half... line from choice-point and inverse-point is been definited to me diameter... a line in 3 dimensions... this is current with 3 points: reference of half (left point of current), current right up and current right down... there is also HPI point... this point is simulative of the external-word... from (10,10,10) to HPI point there is a distance... i’ve definite it like altitude... we have obtained a T structure: diameter and altitude, with point (10,10,10) intersection of horizontal-vertical... triangle is union of future-point with past-point and with HPI-point... if future coincide with past we are in the present instant of half and diameter is a point, point of half... if HPI point coincide with point of half there is a null altitude... triangle is a point, point (10,10,10)... 3 points in one point... remember, model is 3D... coordinates (10,10,10) are 2D of space and 1D of time... space is a bidimensional plane and time is coordinate of 3° dimension, the thick of the plane, a plane-deformation... in this way perception is three-dimensional... each existenz is in the half of perception... perception is a plane with a time-lenght

[Marco Pittaluga]

i'm sorry... external-world, where world is a system in 2D... inanimated space is in my model 2D, is a space in zero time, and zero time is a constant instant of present in the half of time-line... inanimated-space is a plane, an open-sphere, a sphere with an hole... if sphere is close it is 3D but 3° dimension is dimension of the time... in this way system is in equilibrium, don't collpase... Universe stay up, in the half... my perception is a plane like external space but i see 3D because exist a deformation-lenght (the time)... i know time and his movement, i'm perceptive... 3D... inanimated space is zero-time becuase isn't emotional, haven't perception... 2D inanimated are equal to my 2D and my time is an other dimension of perception 3D... I stay with foots on the inanimated-plane, is Universe my basis... basis of Universe is a zero-time

[Jeffry Bodain]

Excellent Coding. Great quality.

[Jimmy Papoudapoulos]

I don't get the figure...thanks, just what I was waiting for. Finally I can proceed with my work in engineering!

[m p]

triply bad

[w s]

And what is a HPI-Point. Can you please explain? Please try to write full sentences. Otherwise your writings are really hard to read. Sentences that end with ... are really confusing. In order to spread ideas you should better articulate your ideas. Otherwise nobody will understand.

[w s]

Still, by the way. This should really not be a place to "blog".

[Marco Pittaluga]

the inanimated system

[Marco Pity]

Inf=number. All programs are numbers. I am good programmer. Odd or not odd, or even, time/space points included...fprintf will loop till space points are connected. Life is system, triple points are infinite life....

[Marco Pittaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa (also Pitty, with 2 t)]

yes.... inf=0 inf=1 inf=2 etc etc etc... when you write a program you write letter like variable... x=0 x=1 x=2 is the same of inf=number... there are many other thing to say.... letters and numbers... symbols

[Marco Pitty]

I finally get it, I finally understand it!

[Marco Pitty]

ok, i'm happy

[Hal 9000]

 

[alain boyer]

 

[V. Poor]

 

[M P]

 

[pitta]

 

[James]

 

[C]

 

[Ripley]

good lord this is some awful programming!

[Bishop]

 

[newt]

 

[Hudson]