View License

Download apps, toolboxes, and other File Exchange content using Add-On Explorer in MATLAB.

» Watch video

Highlights from
Alamouti STBC

4.2 | 5 ratings Rate this file 47 Downloads (last 30 days) File Size: 2.41 KB File ID: #22305 Version: 1.1
image thumbnail

Alamouti STBC



03 Dec 2008 (Updated )

Discuss 2Tx. 1Rx transmit diversity scheme called Alamouti Space Time Block Coding (STBC)

| Watch this File

File Information

A simple Space Time Code, suggested by Mr. Siavash M Alamouti in his landmark October 1998 paper - A Simple Transmit Diversity Technique for Wireless Communication, offers a simple method for achieving spatial diversity with two transmit antennas.

Since the estimate of the transmitted symbol with the Alamouti STBC scheme is identical to that obtained from MRC, the BER should be same as that for MRC. However, there is a small catch. With Alamouti STBC, we are transmitting from two antenna’s. Hence the total transmit power in the Alamouti scheme is twice that of that used in MRC. To make the comparison fair, we need to make the total trannsmit power from two antennas in STBC case to be equal to that of power transmitted from a single antenna in the MRC case.

With this scaling, we can see that BER performance of 2Tx, 1Rx Alamouti STBC case has a roughly 3dB poorer performance that 1Tx, 2Rx MRC case.

For theoretical details on 2 transmit, 1 receive Alamouti STBC coding and its equalization, please check

MATLAB release MATLAB 7 (R14)
Tags for This File   Please login to tag files.
Please login to add a comment or rating.
Comments and Ratings (15)
17 Sep 2016 sandeep atjwal

hi does anyone have code to write 2*2 mimo stbc in arduino

Comment only
30 Jun 2016 Nebiyu Mohammed

15 Mar 2016 Nguyen Quang Vinh

if you have STBC with 6 or 8 antennas transmiter * 1 antenna receiver matlab code please show me, i need it to find my error. thanks so much!

Comment only
13 Apr 2015 Ramadan Grera

Kindly . Send me Alamouti 2x1 noncoherent matlab code DBPSK

Comment only
08 Nov 2014 Sonali

Sonali (view profile)

sir, kindly send the code for STBC-SM (space time block coded spatial modulation).

Comment only
02 Jul 2014 Saiful Ahmed

do you have any codes for 2 transmit and 2 received antennas

Comment only
16 May 2014 Hasima Mat

i have used 64-QAM rather than PSK type, do any one have?? please email to #stbc #sfbc #stfbc .. thanks

Comment only
27 Feb 2013 Jimmy Ahuja

Sir.. instead of using BPSK i have used QAM and have removed noise i.e. ideal channel but the BER is comming 0.5..

Is the code designed only for BPSK modulation??
Plz Help..

27 Feb 2013 Jimmy Ahuja

Sir.. instead of using BPSK i have used QAM and have removed noise i.e. ideal channel but the BER is comming 0.5..

Is the code designed only for BPSK modulation??
Plz Help..

Comment only
05 Oct 2009 Shanar

Shanar (view profile)

Hi Mate
This is really good work just I have simple question in my mind, can i emplement your code to work on IEEE802.16 transmitter receiver?
Thanks in advance

04 Apr 2009 Krishna Sankar M

@Yi Xiao: The channel power is indeed the scaling factor, no?

Comment only
26 Mar 2009 PRAVEENA

21 Mar 2009 Yi Xiao

Thank u, it helps a lot. By the way, could u please recommend me some paper or articles that talk about the scaling factor problem for Alamouti's code in higher order modulation?

I am studing on Alamouti's paper and I can get the same simulation result when using BPSK but not for QPSK, ur code inspires me alot and I want to learn more about scaling factor u mentioned.

Thanks again.

Comment only
21 Mar 2009 Krishna Sankar M

@Yi Xiao: Well, for BPSK constellation, you are right - one need not divide by the channel power. However, for higher order modulations one needs to take care of the scaling factor such that the constellation boundaries can be defined correctly. Hence provided the equation for the general case. Hope this helps.

Comment only
18 Mar 2009 Yi Xiao

Very good! Clear codes and explanation.

Only one question, why we need these lines:
yHat = sum(hEq.*yMod,1)./hEqPower;
yHat(2:2:end) = conj(yHat(2:2:end));

I mean, if the decision rule is: ipHat = real(yHat)>0;
yHat = sum(hEq.*yMod,1)
will be enough for everything.
Why do we need to divide it by the power of the channel and do the conjugate for
h2*y1 -h1y2* ?
I am a little bit confused here.

27 Jun 2009 1.1

Updated to BSD license

27 Jun 2009 1.2

Changed to BSD license

Contact us