Comparing survival curves of two groups using the log rank test
Comparison of two survival curves can be done using a statistical hypothesis test called the log rank test. It is used to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the population survival curves (i.e. the probability of an event occurring at any time point is the same for each population). This function use the KaplanMeier procedure to estimate the survival function, so it is mandatory to download
KMPLOT (http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22293).
1.13  bug fixed on input data checkpoint section 

1.12  MantelHaenszel Hazard ratio was added 

1.11  It is better clarified that this is a 2tailed test 

1.10  function was adapted to the new kmplot function 

1.9  hazard ratio added 

1.7  correction in pvalue computation (thanks to Prof. Brani Vidakovic) 

1.6  Changes in code to solve an incompatibility with Mac (Thanks to Tim the cyclist) 

1.5  Changes in description 

1.4  Correction of a bug that occurs when data are not censored 

1.3  Correction to avoid NaN in Standard error computation 

1.2  correction when the first value is censored 

1.1  changes in help section for correct citation 
Inspired: MatSurv
Haoyu Zhong (view profile)
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
Thank you Jacob.
For the first question, kmplot shows confidence intervals and median time. If I add these lines on Logrank it became too difficult to understand.
For the second question, you can use "text" or "gtext" matlab function to add on to the plot whatever you want.
Feel free to modify the code.
Jacob Scott (view profile)
One more thought  could you make it so that the hazard ratios and pvalue are reported in the figure?
thanks so much for this
Jacob Scott (view profile)
I've found that the plots that come out of kmplot are much prettier (and contain more information) than the plots that are generated by logrank. Is there a way that I'm missing to plot two survival curves on the same axis using kmplot? or to make the plots from logrank more similar to those of kmplot?
Thanks, great tool.
Fernando Pena (view profile)
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
Thank you Jan.
1) You are right. There is a bug in kmplot not in logrank. Now I have just upload the new version of kmplot on FEX. If you need, write me in private and I'll send you the file.
2) they are both correct! I explain. If you are doing a test of a drug against placebo, you will use a 1tailed test (because, before to do the experiments you are thinking that drug is better of placebo). But if you are testing two different drugs or two different protocols you can only ask to logrank test: Are they different? And so you have to use a 2tailed test. Of course, 1tailed test are more powerful but the conditions to apply them are not always respected. Anyway, I'll clarify this in the logrank help and output
Jan liphardt (view profile)
Very useful, but I had two questions. (1) LogRank gives an error at line 116, at [table1 table12 t1 T1 xcg1 ycg1 lambda1]=kmplot(x1,0.05,cflag,0);
This is fixed by deleting the last arg to kmplot, giving kmplot(x1,0.05,flag);
2) The pvalue for LogRank is twice what it should be? 0.03058 vs. 0.01529 in the file header. Perhaps, mismatch between old documentation and changed function, or extra factor of 2 in p = 2*(10.5*erfc(z/realsqrt(2))); %pvalue
Removing Yates' gives 0.019250, which is correct. I tend to think 0.03058 is correct, with the Yates' correction. Thanks for the superuseful code!
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
the cyclist is right. He did a perfect explanation
the cyclist (view profile)
The logrank calculation here is correct. This code applies the Yates correction in the calculation of the zscore. (Line 207 of my version of the code.) I get 0.0193 from this code when I remove the Yates correction.
Nitin (view profile)
I also am having trouble with this function.. the pvalues are always slightly off (usually a little higher than what I get using other programs)
Abhijit (view profile)
I'm sorry, but using your software I do not get the pvalue for the logrank test that is consistent with the results of either R or Stata (both of which match). For the test data supplied with the function, I get a pvalue of 0.0193, whereas you're getting a pvalue of 0.01529. The KM curves are the same, but there is apparently something wrong in your logrank computation.
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
I have just uploaded a new version of KMPLOT and LOGRANK that compute hazard rate and hazard ratio
sunbb (view profile)
Is there a way to retrieve the Hazard ratio from the output of Logrank or Kmplot function?
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
Yes it is. The 0.05 put in that lines is a dummy variable. Infact, in that lines logrank invokes kmplot to compute needed tables (i didnt want to duplicate code). If you look inside kmplot it is commented that a piece of code id jumped whan invoked by logrank and in that piece of code alpha is used to compute the confidence interval of survival curve (that is useless in logrank).
the cyclist (view profile)
I notice that in the call to kmplot [lines 9697] in current version, the hardcoded value 0.05 is used, even if alpha is specified differently as an input. Is that correct?
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
Dear Sven, thank you for your email.
T1 and T2 are cleared because they don't appear in the output. As everybody can see in the figure (without downloading the function) logrank always prints all needed output parameters. Logrank recalls another function that is kmplot: this function can give back T1 (if you want). Anyway this possibility is hidden because usually you are only interested to the plot.
Sven (view profile)
Excellent submission  thank you. One note: the outputs to the function [T1,T2] are actually cleared during computation, so an error is thrown if output is requested. To conform a little bit to the MATLAB stats package, I suggest the following changes:
Line one should change to:
function [h,p] = logrank(varargin)
and the end of the function should set h as follows:
h = p<alpha;
The help section could then say:
% Displays:
% KaplanMeier plot
% Logrank statistics
% Outputs:
% H : statistical significance (true if P<ALPHA)
% P : Pvalue for logrank test
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
Thank you for your comment. If you type on matlab "help logrank" you'll find the reference.
J Rey (view profile)
Beautiful, thanks for sharing this. If we use your software for a journal purpose, what reference should we use?
J Rey (view profile)
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
At the moment, there is not on FEX the new uploaded file (this takes 12 days). If you contact me in private, I'll send you the file as an attach
the cyclist (view profile)
Thanks for the really quick reply. I appreciate it.
However, the program still crashes for me, with the same error, when I try the syntax you suggest. Maybe the version on the File Exchange is not quite the same as yours?
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
You are partially right. If you use only the first column, the routine crashes because the informations in the second column are mandatory. If you want no censored data:
>> x1(:,2)=0; x2(:,2)=0; logrank(x1,x2);
Anyway, a bug was present but I fixed it and upload the new version.
the cyclist (view profile)
It seems to me that this function does not work for the case when none of the data are censored. (That shouldn't be a problem, should it?) For example, using only the first columns of your sample x1 and x2:
>> logrank(x1(:,1),x2(:,1))
causes a crash for me.
En Bl (view profile)
Thanks.
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
I have corrected the bug and uploaded the new version. Anyway, with all these censored data, it is difficult to assess differences....
En Bl (view profile)
Here is the data:
x1 =
3010 1
1733 1
2797 1
334 0
3678 1
3314 1
4378 1
3253 1
1672 0
3709 1
1642 1
3040 1
2827 1
and x2 =
1955 1
1808 1
2037 1
3136 1
938 0
3497 1
2858 1
3832 1
3256 0
2933 0
5054 1
927 0
3795 0
4155 1
3304 0
sorry for the late reply.
Giuseppe Cardillo (view profile)
Perhaps, if you email me the data I can understand the error. I think that your input data matrix are in a wrong format.
En Bl (view profile)
I get this error:
Matrix dimensions must agree.
Error in ==> logrank at 157
K=find((table12(:,1)<table(c(I),1) & table12(:,1)>=table(J,1)),1,'last');
I debugged it and J=[] .