A newer zip-file is now available from http://www.ux.uis.no/~karlsk/proj99/index.html
12 Nov 2007
12 Mar 2007
It`s not bad. However, I think you can make it more simple and efficient. It`s too long and it needs three other function beside the orginal one, you can combine them in one function and much less lines. it's going to be then more faster in execution and less error. I have made one but still in progress. anyway, mine is much less lines than this one. You are like trying to execute 1+1 in this manner y = 1, x = 1, and z = y, s = x, then g = z + s.
Good luck man.
25 Dec 2006
25 Oct 2005
its really nice
03 Mar 2005
the coding process is not running correctly it fails in encoding itself help for it
21 Apr 2004
I tried using a square wave with a long period and the compression was no different than for a random sequence. There appears to be a bug that needs fixing first.
19 Apr 2004
Doesn't seem to work, e.g., for a constant sequence it gives irrelevant codewords.