Angelini Federico

Very useful to me. Worked without any hitches. Thanks very much.

Um, all of the many linear least squares tools in Matlab are "absolutely deterministic". So that claim by the author is a bit silly. Why be proud of something so trivial?

More importantly, the code uses a poor scheme for the computations. The method used will be inaccurate when the problem is ill-conditioned. (Yes, ill-conditioning can be an issue even for a linear model when you have a weighted regression.)

The help could use some serious improvement. It lacks an explicit list of the variables, showing the order they appear. Nor does it have an example of use. Many users find an example a big help when they try to use a tool.

The help completely fails to describe the many output variables. What, for example, might the 4th output variable tell you? I don't feel like guessing, and the variable name is not terribly illuminating.

As for the code itself, besides using a poor methodolgy for the regression, the author provides only a single error check, one which in fact is a poor choice. If you call this code with vectors of data, one of which is a row vector, the other a column vector, the code produces an error. Better code would realize that both are vectors. Since the help only specifies that the inputs must be vectors, a user will be confused when they get an error for a valid set of data as defined by the help.

Next, no error check was provided for a singular problem, a far more important check to provide.

One of the lines in the code lacks a semi-colon, so it dumps stuff to the screen when you run it.

There are no internal comments in the code, so anyone who wants to learn what the code does by reading it had better already know what the author intended.

Oh, by the way, you don't need a return statement at the end of your functions.