Rank: 2494 based on 55 downloads (last 30 days) and 2 files submitted
photo

Saul

E-mail

Personal Profile:
Professional Interests:

 

Watch this Author's files

 

Files Posted by Saul View all
Updated   File Tags Downloads
(last 30 days)
Comments Rating
08 Nov 2013 Mummy Dual-Energy CT Analysis Analysis code to enable separation of up to 3 materials using dual-energy CT data. Author: Saul computed tomography, ct, dual energy, mummy, material separation 20 0
25 Apr 2013 Calculation of CT MTF and NPS using the ACR accreditation phantom This code enables measurements of CT MTF and NPS from images of an ACR accreditation phantom. Author: Saul computed tomography, ct, modulation transfer f..., mtf, resolution, noisepowerspectrum 35 4
  • 4.0
4.0 | 1 rating
Comments and Ratings by Saul View all
Updated File Comments Rating
23 Jul 2013 Calculation of CT MTF and NPS using the ACR accreditation phantom This code enables measurements of CT MTF and NPS from images of an ACR accreditation phantom. Author: Saul

Ball bearings and rings are neither needed nor desired for the MTF or NPS calculations. The "mask" to exclude these portions was simply a means to work around these undesired regions when calculating the MTF. If your phantom does not have them, then the mask is not necessary. With that in mind, I do not yet see where the code may need to be modified.

I think the first questions to tackle are what are your "expected" MTF and NPS, and how do you know they are accurate? Both will be greatly affected by the system you use, the protocol chosen, and any post-processing algorithms your system may be using. If you wish to validate your phantom, it would be best to use the same system and protocol as tested in the referenced Med. Phys. article above, and compare your results with the published ones.

21 Jul 2013 Calculation of CT MTF and NPS using the ACR accreditation phantom This code enables measurements of CT MTF and NPS from images of an ACR accreditation phantom. Author: Saul

I'm not familiar with the phantom, however, when I tried to pull up the specs on it, it does appear to have an "Image Uniformity Module" that seems comparable to the ACR phantom. If this module is sufficiently uniform and wide enough, I would expect you to be able to use the code without any modifications and achieve comparable results. A comparison of the results from the two phantoms would be an interesting experiment.

Comments and Ratings on Saul's Files View all
Updated File Comment by Comments Rating
24 Oct 2013 Calculation of CT MTF and NPS using the ACR accreditation phantom This code enables measurements of CT MTF and NPS from images of an ACR accreditation phantom. Author: Saul Azeez

23 Jul 2013 Calculation of CT MTF and NPS using the ACR accreditation phantom This code enables measurements of CT MTF and NPS from images of an ACR accreditation phantom. Author: Saul Saul

Ball bearings and rings are neither needed nor desired for the MTF or NPS calculations. The "mask" to exclude these portions was simply a means to work around these undesired regions when calculating the MTF. If your phantom does not have them, then the mask is not necessary. With that in mind, I do not yet see where the code may need to be modified.

I think the first questions to tackle are what are your "expected" MTF and NPS, and how do you know they are accurate? Both will be greatly affected by the system you use, the protocol chosen, and any post-processing algorithms your system may be using. If you wish to validate your phantom, it would be best to use the same system and protocol as tested in the referenced Med. Phys. article above, and compare your results with the published ones.

22 Jul 2013 Calculation of CT MTF and NPS using the ACR accreditation phantom This code enables measurements of CT MTF and NPS from images of an ACR accreditation phantom. Author: Saul Azeez

Yes Saul, the uniformity module is comparable to the ACR phantom however, the module doesn't have the ball bearing locations and rings as exempted when calculating the MTF's in the code. The phantom is about 20 cm wide also and relatively uniform.
Running the code without much modifications however, I wasn't obtaining MTF and NPS plot shapes as expected even when I included the excluded regions. Hence, I supposed I may need to make some modifications to get good data. Any suggestions?

21 Jul 2013 Calculation of CT MTF and NPS using the ACR accreditation phantom This code enables measurements of CT MTF and NPS from images of an ACR accreditation phantom. Author: Saul Saul

I'm not familiar with the phantom, however, when I tried to pull up the specs on it, it does appear to have an "Image Uniformity Module" that seems comparable to the ACR phantom. If this module is sufficiently uniform and wide enough, I would expect you to be able to use the code without any modifications and achieve comparable results. A comparison of the results from the two phantoms would be an interesting experiment.

18 Jul 2013 Calculation of CT MTF and NPS using the ACR accreditation phantom This code enables measurements of CT MTF and NPS from images of an ACR accreditation phantom. Author: Saul Azeez

I wanted to ask if this code need to be modified to use it on the Catphan500/600 phantoms?

Contact us