Wang YQ

Dear BMV,

thank you for your interest in my work!

in the getMTV function, ac2 = ac*ac, just ac2 is used,and ac is also designed as an input arg. At the initial stage when I built the program, I think ac may be helpful for future, it is not used at present.

in addition, the MTV can be extended for color image, texture image, and even using the nonlocal strategy.

Dear BMV: Many thanks for your interest in our work!

ISRGB: This function is obsolete and may be removed in future versions.

if the matlab version is too high, the function ISRGB is not no longer valid. we use this function to transfer the RGB image to GRAY image, one can delete the code and use other function, or directly read into a gray image.

the filename 'fig3.bmp' may be changed to other file one used.

Dear BMV,

thank you for your interest in my work!

in the getMTV function, ac2 = ac*ac, just ac2 is used,and ac is also designed as an input arg. At the initial stage when I built the program, I think ac may be helpful for future, it is not used at present.

in addition, the MTV can be extended for color image, texture image, and even using the nonlocal strategy.

the MTV model is formulated as the EQ.(4) in this Letter, it can also be interpreted as an energy minimization in Eq.(3).

although the paper has been pulished, after thinking for a period of time, I raised the following question:

In fact, it is easy to find the solution of Eq.(3) since the original noisy image is ready and it is not necessary to solve the PDE in Eq(4). On the other hand, the Eq.(4) works very well to find the final result. it seems there is a paradox.

I need someone to comment this paradox, ^-^, thank you !