First of all, thanks for your quick response in the previous comment I made. I'va keep on working on fatigue testing and I've found another problem.
I am analysing some test data with this algorithm but another research center is analysing the same data and they are reaching diferent results. They are using the algorithm of Downing and Socie "Simplified Rainflow Counting method".
Is it normal that we obtain different results because of that?
I'm working on fatigue testing and I'm using the rainflow algorithm with long and quite complex signals.
reading thought rfdemo2 I've noticed that the function
sig2ext is called twice. Is that necesary?
I will be gratefull of any help
I'm running the tool, and it works very well! Thank you!
But why you describe the cycles with Amplitudes and not Range? Is it correct, to multibly the amplitude by 2 at the end to get the range?
(2*mx) to get the