I am a Ph. D. Optics student. I have a wife and a son, and much more interested in helping people (even researchers) to compute stuff than proposing new ideas.
Hello, Patrick. It is quite a coincidence that I am working in this same subject (kind of). I do not have, however, the latest Parallel Computing Toolbox (PCTB) and I would like to do some questions. Do you choose to use CUDA over standard parallel computing (multicore) by any particular reason? Is the FFT2 parallelized in the new version of PCTB (as far as I know, I'm my version it is only parallelized 1D FFT)? I am using 2009b, by the way. Thanks!
Great function to let you know the integrator's progress. The best feature is it's simplicity.
It appears that the demo file wasn't included in this zip file, but it's very simple to use, just add it as an output function in the odeset command. Here's an example:
ops = odeset('OutputFcn',@odetpbar);
[t,y] = ode45(@DiffEqns,Timespan,InitConditons,ops);
Great function to let you know the integrator's progress. The best feature is it's simplicity.
It appears that the demo file wasn't included in this zip file, but it's very simple to use, just add it as an output function in the odeset command. Here's an example:
ops = odeset('OutputFcn',@odetpbar);
[t,y] = ode45(@DiffEqns,Timespan,InitConditons,ops);
