<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/158203</link>
    <title>MATLAB Central Newsreader - Catalytic vs. 2007B Embedded Matlab</title>
    <description>Feed for thread: Catalytic vs. 2007B Embedded Matlab</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy;1994-2012 by MathWorks, Inc.</copyright>
    <webmaster>webmaster@mathworks.com</webmaster>
    <generator>MATLAB Central Newsreader</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:19:31 -0400</pubDate>
      <title>Catalytic vs. 2007B Embedded Matlab</title>
      <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/158203#398042</link>
      <author>Brandeis </author>
      <description>All,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
With the 2007B release MATLAB has made several &lt;br&gt;
improvements in regards to automatically generating C code &lt;br&gt;
from MATLAB and allowing for simulations to be run at &lt;br&gt;
compiled C speeds (for both fixed and floating point).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Previously, this could only be done with the latest MATLAB &lt;br&gt;
through a third party tool called Catalytic. I am curious &lt;br&gt;
how users think the new 2007B embedded MATLAB works vs. &lt;br&gt;
the catalytic tool.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
What are the pros and cons of using one tool vs. the other &lt;br&gt;
for automatically generating C code from MATLAB and/or &lt;br&gt;
running simulations at compilied C speeds?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks for your opinions!!!</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

