<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/243196</link>
    <title>MATLAB Central Newsreader - flag as spam</title>
    <description>Feed for thread: flag as spam</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy;1994-2012 by MathWorks, Inc.</copyright>
    <webmaster>webmaster@mathworks.com</webmaster>
    <generator>MATLAB Central Newsreader</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:21:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <title>flag as spam</title>
      <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/243196#624245</link>
      <author>David </author>
      <description>Ok, 2 new spams come up and get 10-15 hits within minutes on the matlab newsreader... the first 5 of you readers could have saved the rest of us from even seeing those messages if you just hit the 'flag as spam' link in the newsreader.  Don't bother tagging it, hit the flag as spam link and make it go away!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:03:38 -0500</pubDate>
      <title>Re: flag as spam</title>
      <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/243196#624261</link>
      <author>ImageAnalyst</author>
      <description>I don't believe they're tagging it.  I think once I was the first one&lt;br&gt;
to flag a particular message as spam, and the Mathworks Newsreader&lt;br&gt;
automatically added the spam tag for me.  (I could be wrong on that.)&lt;br&gt;
But I do agree with you that there's no sense to open it up and then&lt;br&gt;
just not flag it as spam.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:02:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <title>Re: flag as spam</title>
      <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/243196#624374</link>
      <author>NZTideMan</author>
      <description>On Jan 28, 2:03=A0am, ImageAnalyst &amp;lt;imageanal...@mailinator.com&amp;gt; wrote:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; I don't believe they're tagging it. =A0I think once I was the first one&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; to flag a particular message as spam, and the Mathworks Newsreader&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; automatically added the spam tag for me. =A0(I could be wrong on that.)&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; But I do agree with you that there's no sense to open it up and then&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; just not flag it as spam.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Maybe they (like me) were using Google Groups as their newsreader&lt;br&gt;
where there is no obvious way of marking a posting as spam.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:07:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <title>Re: flag as spam</title>
      <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/243196#624395</link>
      <author>ImageAnalyst</author>
      <description>On Jan 27, 2:02=A0pm, NZTideMan &amp;lt;mul...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; On Jan 28, 2:03=A0am, ImageAnalyst &amp;lt;imageanal...@mailinator.com&amp;gt; wrote:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; I don't believe they're tagging it. =A0I think once I was the first one&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; to flag a particular message as spam, and the Mathworks Newsreader&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; automatically added the spam tag for me. =A0(I could be wrong on that.)&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; But I do agree with you that there's no sense to open it up and then&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; just not flag it as spam.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; Maybe they (like me) were using Google Groups as their newsreader&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; where there is no obvious way of marking a posting as spam.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
I'm not sure the Mathworks newsreader asks Google how many times&lt;br&gt;
people brought up a post, but I doubt it.  I think the Mathworks&lt;br&gt;
newsreader just lists views on itself, not globally over all&lt;br&gt;
newsreaders.  Google does have some nice features though (such as&lt;br&gt;
showing which of your posts got replied to, being able to search back&lt;br&gt;
to 1994, etc.)  I just wish I could have message filters for it.  The&lt;br&gt;
spam flagger is a nice feature for a small closed environment like&lt;br&gt;
Mathworks but I'm not sure it would work for a globally accessible&lt;br&gt;
newsreader like Google (people would spam-can some posts just because&lt;br&gt;
they disagree with them).</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:31:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <title>Re: flag as spam</title>
      <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/243196#625831</link>
      <author>Helen Chen</author>
      <description>Thanks for pointing this out.  We have reproduced this error and have escalated the problem to MATLAB Central engineering. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks again, &lt;br&gt;
Helen</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:45:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <title>Re: flag as spam</title>
      <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/243196#625894</link>
      <author>ImageAnalyst</author>
      <description>On Feb 3, 2:31=A0pm, &quot;Helen Chen&quot; &amp;lt;helen.c...@mathworks.com&amp;gt; wrote:&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; Thanks for pointing this out. =A0We have reproduced this error and have e=&lt;br&gt;
scalated the problem to MATLAB Central engineering.&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; Thanks again,&lt;br&gt;
&amp;gt; Helen&lt;br&gt;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=&lt;br&gt;
-----&lt;br&gt;
Helen:&lt;br&gt;
I think you meant to reply to the other thread that mentioned that the&lt;br&gt;
spam flagging capability was broken.  This thread just lamented the&lt;br&gt;
fact that people read but don't flag, and lamented the fact that the&lt;br&gt;
Mathworks newsreader doesn't have some nice features that Google has&lt;br&gt;
such as putting at the bottom a list of threads (with links) that&lt;br&gt;
you've recently posted to, or the ability to view a thread as a tree&lt;br&gt;
structure so that you can really tell who replied to whom.  Those&lt;br&gt;
would be nice value-added features (in addition to fixing the broken&lt;br&gt;
spam flagger).&lt;br&gt;
Thanks,&lt;br&gt;
ImageAnalyst</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

