<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/264859</link>
    <title>MATLAB Central Newsreader - quantitative measure of similarity of curves</title>
    <description>Feed for thread: quantitative measure of similarity of curves</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy;1994-2012 by MathWorks, Inc.</copyright>
    <webmaster>webmaster@mathworks.com</webmaster>
    <generator>MATLAB Central Newsreader</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:08:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <title>quantitative measure of similarity of curves</title>
      <link>http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/264859#691785</link>
      <author>Frank Chang</author>
      <description>Hi Group,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I am not sure if this is the appropriate newsgroup to post this&lt;br&gt;
question. But I feel like we have people with all kinds of expertise&lt;br&gt;
here. So I am giving it a try.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Let's assume we have many curves which are similar to each other&lt;br&gt;
(measurement taken at different times). These curves stabilize over&lt;br&gt;
time (i.e., fluctuate more at the beginning of the sequence, less in&lt;br&gt;
the end). I'd like to find a quantitative measure to characterize&lt;br&gt;
this. So far, I tried a &quot;variance&quot; parameter defined as the following&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
V = sqrt(1/N sum_j(log(Yi, j) - log(Yi+1, j))),&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
where Yi, j is the jth data point of the ith measurement. N is the&lt;br&gt;
number of data points in each measurement, and Yi,j is real positive.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For some reason, this measure does not characterize the stabilization&lt;br&gt;
process well. I am sure there is some statistical measure out there&lt;br&gt;
which is better than this crude calculation. I'd be grateful if you&lt;br&gt;
could please offer your insights.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Frank</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

