From: <HIDDEN>
Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!WebX
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Not completely agree with analysis
Message-ID: <eeb4a65.24@WebX.raydaftYaTP>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 01:39:04 -0500
References: <eeb4a65.-1@WebX.raydaftYaTP> <eeb4a65.9@WebX.raydaftYaTP> <eeb4a65.10@WebX.raydaftYaTP> <eeb4a65.22@WebX.raydaftYaTP> <eeb4a65.23@WebX.raydaftYaTP>
Lines: 10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:142313


In the contest I read some comments about the long codes, and parts
which are not or almost not used.
Some of the code (maybe a big part) is not or almoset not necessary. 
But if a part is used only once, where the improvement of the score
is (more then) enough to compensate for the loss in CPU-time, that
part contributes to the code.
And also in the method list, there is the "spiral", which also came
from me.


Stijn