From: <HIDDEN>
Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!WebX
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Test case rough statistics
Message-ID: <eeb4a65.68@WebX.raydaftYaTP>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 04:58:31 -0500
References: <eeb4a65.-1@WebX.raydaftYaTP> <eeb4a65.36@WebX.raydaftYaTP> <eeb4a65.66@WebX.raydaftYaTP>
Lines: 14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:142744


Great Rumpuscat wrote:
> 
> 
> For the three strings that I believe I determined, I was able to
come
> up with better foldings than the front runners.  But, somehow I
> wasn't able to take advantage of that information, which I find a
> little mystifying.  Anyway, maybe this posting will be of use to
> someone.
Maybe that comes because the random number sequence is changed if you
replace a current solution by a fast one.  (Refer to the improvement
by the "holy line" 'rand(63,1)'


Stijn