From: "Rusty Shackleford" <nosp@m.net>
Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!webcrossing
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: upgrade to Vista
Message-ID: <ef53e8d.13@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:30:42 -0400
References: <ef53e8d.7@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <ef53e8d.8@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <ef53e8d.10@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <ef53e8d.11@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <ef53e8d.12@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP>
Lines: 41
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.76.96.17
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:410931


Right. We should have all just stuck with Windows 3.1, since that
worked perfectly fine.

I wouldn't hold your breath on this one though. Mathworks is touting
the latest version with "...R2007a adds support for the Intel® based
Mac, Windows Vista™, and 64-bit Sun Solaris™ SPARC platforms..."

Based on this I doubt they'll be releasing any fixes for this problem
on 6.5. I'm thinking we'll just have to bite the bullet and get the
new version.

 vivek mathur wrote:
>
>
> Hello everyone, I am getting the exact same problem ( license
> manager
> error -103) . Does anyone have ANY solution for this problem. I
> need
> some help urgently. Please reply if you have solved your problem.
> Thanks a lot
>
> PS : The argument abt running on Vista is absurd since we dont have
> much choice. Most laptops come only with vista. Though i do agree
> that it is one of the most "troublesome" OS ive ever used...
>
> M wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have to ask, why are you all trying to run Matlab on an OS
that
>> is
>> largely unproven, highly software incompatible and takes a more
>> substantial portion of system resources?
>>
>> I am unaware of what advantage Vista has that requires anyone
to
>> install it at this time. Surely using XP means you get more
value
>> from your hardware as less of it is devoted to run the OS?
>>
>> - M