From: "niCk cAMel" <nick_camel@msn.com>
Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!webcrossing
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: upgrade to Vista
Message-ID: <ef53e8d.14@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:36:16 -0400
References: <ef53e8d.8@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <ef53e8d.10@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <ef53e8d.11@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <ef53e8d.12@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <ef53e8d.13@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP>
Lines: 62
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.233.204.57
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:410945


HAHA... win 3.1 or just DOS. :)
I know that this reply is not worth 50 cent (another joke)
but the same goes for all replies in this forum.
it´s a DEAD END.

have nice day.

Rusty Shackleford wrote:
>
>
> Right. We should have all just stuck with Windows 3.1, since that
> worked perfectly fine.
>
> I wouldn't hold your breath on this one though. Mathworks is
> touting
> the latest version with "...R2007a adds support for the Intel®
> based
> Mac, Windows Vista™, and 64-bit Sun Solaris™ SPARC platforms..."
>
> Based on this I doubt they'll be releasing any fixes for this
> problem
> on 6.5. I'm thinking we'll just have to bite the bullet and get
> the
> new version.
>
> vivek mathur wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello everyone, I am getting the exact same problem ( license
>> manager
>> error -103) . Does anyone have ANY solution for this problem.
I
>> need
>> some help urgently. Please reply if you have solved your
problem.
>> Thanks a lot
>>
>> PS : The argument abt running on Vista is absurd since we dont
> have
>> much choice. Most laptops come only with vista. Though i do
> agree
>> that it is one of the most "troublesome" OS ive ever used...
>>
>> M wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I have to ask, why are you all trying to run Matlab on an
OS
> that
>>> is
>>> largely unproven, highly software incompatible and takes a
> more
>>> substantial portion of system resources?
>>>
>>> I am unaware of what advantage Vista has that requires
anyone
> to
>>> install it at this time. Surely using XP means you get more
> value
>>> from your hardware as less of it is devoted to run the OS?
>>>
>>> - M