Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!feeder.erje.net!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: dpb <none@non.net>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: etiquette (top-posting or bottom posting)
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 09:11:03 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <fbegea$945$1@aioe.org>
References: <fbd4o6$mlo$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fbd76t$n5n$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fbda4i$sd8$1@fred.mathworks.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: AanNxk8fndTxG1CNeOQTCQ.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:426666


G.A.M. wrote:
...[top posting repaired]...
> "us " <us@neurol.unizh.ch> wrote in message
> <fbd76t$n5n$1@fred.mathworks.com>...
>> G.A.M.:
>> <SNIP artificial worries...
>>
>> who cares - as long as it is an interesting posting...
...
 > OK - glad to hear that.

Well, add me to the list who prefers bottom-posting and second's 
Walter's take to GAM --  even after reading the followups.

Snip to pertinent sections retaining attribution and add to the 
continuing conversation maintaining the flow -- since we read English 
from top to bottom, it only makes sense to keep the chronological flow.

$0.02, etc., ...

--