Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: ML Classes - What is the right way to construct classes?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:33:20 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: KTH
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <fcp960$n1q$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <1190044074.433443.295080@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1190133683.090984.194360@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-06-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1190144000 23610 172.30.248.36 (18 Sep 2007 19:33:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:33:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1670
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:429177



> > <snip>
> per- thanks for the link. This looks like one of the most
> interesting sites I have seen in my short time using ML.

ML is **not** Matlab. See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metalanguage and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_%28programming_language%29

>I am particularly intrigued by this statement:
> 
> "Fairly soon after I discovered nested functions I 
> realized the dual between objects and NF's. An object is
> really just a set of nested functions over a common 
> scope."

I use this approach extensively and I recommend you to give 
it a try. In a post a couple of weeks ago I gave another 
couple of references:

Subject: Re: What am I doing wrong here
From: Per Isakson
Date: 02 Sep, 2007 14:33:00

/ per