Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: Brian Arnold <barnold@mathworks.com>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: 2007a and Mac 10.5 Leopard
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:00:39 -0400
Organization: The MathWorks, Inc.
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <4725D977.5080107@mathworks.com>
References: <ef51523.-1@webcrossing.raydaftYaTP> <eu0t4c$mau$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ffaks5$nml$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ffb16l$7uh$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ffvd99$fhf$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ffvfkj$9ce$1@fred.mathworks.com> <ffvg35$gcb$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fg06p9$6rr$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fg4fij$ibi$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fg4ie9$npf$1@fred.mathworks.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arnoldb-mac1.dhcp.mathworks.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1193662839 3924 144.212.108.69 (29 Oct 2007 13:00:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: "H.J.M." <hverhaar@nl.environcorp.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
In-Reply-To: <fg4ie9$npf$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:435064



Hi,

Does turning off the MATLAB Preferences -> Editor -> Code Folding 
"Function Code" result in better scrolling performance?

We will investigate this further.

- Brian


H.J.M. wrote:
> "Viton Vitanis" <viton.vitanis@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> <fg4fij$ibi$1@fred.mathworks.com>...
>> Hi Brian.
>>
>> I upgraded my iMac (intel, 2.8 GHz, 4GB RAM) from Tiger to
>> Leopard and the Matlab interface (Matlab ver. 2007b) got
>> much slower. In particular when scrolling in Editor the
>> response was so slow that I really couldn't work.
>> Reinstalling X11 and Matlab didn't improve things.
>>
>> Am I missing something there? Is there something I
>> should/shouldn't have done?
> 
> I see the same behaviour on a PPC Dual G5 (with 2 Gb memory). It ain't so 
> slow that I can't work, but it's slow enough to be majorly annoying, to the 
> point that you start issuing commands multiple times since the system 
> appears unresponsive...
> 
> Bench numbers do not seem different from what they were, so my initial 
> guess would be that it has something to do with the java interface. Hope it 
> gets sorted out though...
> 
> Henk