Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: "Tim Davis" <davis@cise.ufl.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Matlab Vectorisation Speed - How is it done in c++?
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:55:58 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Florida
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <fk8cge$egh$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <eb177713-6655-4454-bbf6-92d2c91bb6a6@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>  <825523e3-b124-44a4-b82f-7b01b3495029@f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <fk8anu$jqe$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: "Tim Davis" <davis@cise.ufl.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-02-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1197978958 14865 172.30.248.37 (18 Dec 2007 11:55:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:55:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 45902
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:442893



"Tim Davis" <davis@cise.ufl.edu> wrote in message 
...
> Ditto for FFT (see FFTW for example).  Fast codes are not
> (always) short codes; elegant codes are the fast ones, which
> are not always short.
> 

Steve - since you and I are clearly on the same page, I was
writing more to the other readers of this thread.  So I
tossed out the example of FFTW as a fast, elegant, but not
short, code.  I know about the FFTW ... but I didn't know
off the top of my head who the authors were.

Then I looked up the FFTW after I posted my note, just out
of curiousity, and found that you're one of the 2 co-authors.

So in my reply to you I'm using your own code as an example
... :-D !!