Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: "Duane Hanselman" <masteringmatlab@yahoo.spam.com>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: eval, feval, global
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:07:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Maine
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <fsg65m$p5k$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <fsebf0$43u$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fsf3ss$e2e$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fsfrld$fep$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fsfuht$e44$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fsg06f$8hh$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fsg1fl$p8e$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: "Duane Hanselman" <masteringmatlab@yahoo.spam.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-03-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1206623222 25780 172.30.248.38 (27 Mar 2008 13:07:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:07:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 92533
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:459464


"Phil Goddard" <philgoddardNOSPAM@telus.net> wrote in
message <fsg1fl$p8e$1@fred.mathworks.com>...
> 
> Although mmrepeat is elegent, for Yuri's test case it is 
> almost as slow as Yuri's original (inefficient) loop.

This is interesting. I wrote mmrepeat before JIT existed. So
it was the best then, but now JIT and a good FOR loop is faster!

Needless to say, I am not going to go back and revise every
piece of code I have to find these differences!

Thanks everyone for the good thread.