Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: MATLAB Central Spring Contest
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The MathWorks, Inc.
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <fvd6cg$of3$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <fv82i0$nql$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvbv0f$b3l$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvcqr5$473$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvd0u3$i9i$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvd43d$3g3$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-05-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1209670864 25059 172.30.248.35 (1 May 2008 19:41:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1373473
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:466188


While this is actually just a problem with my current
algorithm, I can make a case that you should accept the
empty set as a valid answer.

Suppose that all pin values are on the order of 1e-9. Based
on the scoring of this puzzle, I can not imagine ever
wanting to connect any pins. The cost of the connector far
out ways the benefits of eliminating the pins.

That being said, I'll go find out what is wrong with my
algorithm.