Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: MATLAB Central Spring Contest
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 20:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Rochester
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <fvd9fr$435$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <fv82i0$nql$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvbv0f$b3l$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvcqr5$473$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvd0u3$i9i$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvd43d$3g3$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvd6cg$of3$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-02-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1209674043 4197 172.30.248.37 (1 May 2008 20:34:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 20:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 684762
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:466198


"Matt Butts" <mattbutts@gmail.com> wrote in message
<fvd6cg$of3$1@fred.mathworks.com>...
> While this is actually just a problem with my current
> algorithm, I can make a case that you should accept the
> empty set as a valid answer.
> 
> Suppose that all pin values are on the order of 1e-9. Based
> on the scoring of this puzzle, I can not imagine ever
> wanting to connect any pins. The cost of the connector far
> out ways the benefits of eliminating the pins.
> 
> That being said, I'll go find out what is wrong with my
> algorithm.
> 

Actually, this is possible, and is exactly what the
contest-supplied solver does.  You just supply a 0 x 4
matrix,  for example by W = zeros(0,4).

Cheers, 
Mike Bindschadler