Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: MATLAB Central Spring Contest
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 22:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The MathWorks, Inc.
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <fvt9bt$ai7$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <fv82i0$nql$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvsk1d$m84$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvsmhv$se6$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvsot0$gr9$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvsqp9$8gg$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvstsb$m4n$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvsv2c$74l$1@fred.mathworks.com> <fvt6t3$cpq$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-02-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1210198205 10823 172.30.248.37 (7 May 2008 22:10:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 22:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 870024
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:467261


"Alfonso Nieto-Castanon" <alfnie@gmail.com> wrote in message
<fvt6t3$cpq$1@fred.mathworks.com>...
> 
> on top of all the very good suggestions to keep the contest 
> engaging and minimally frustrating for everyone I would 
> also suggest reviving some form of generality prize at the 
> end of the contest to keep the interest of those developing 
> non-overfitting solutions and alternative algorithm 
> strategies alive

I like the idea of a generality prize, but I don't think
it's valid to have one after daylight. There are so many
parameter tweaked entries that one of them is bound to be
overfitted to the generality test set. The darkness stage is
probably as close as you can get to a generality contest.