Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: <HIDDEN>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: Saving an anonymous function handle to a mat-file
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:13:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Xoran Technologies
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <gaephe$dmt$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <6iv5vcFn3i0U1@mid.individual.net> <gaektb$glf$1@fred.mathworks.com> <gaenr2$dc7$1@fred.mathworks.com>
Reply-To: <HIDDEN>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-02-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1221257582 14045 172.30.248.37 (12 Sep 2008 22:13:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:13:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 1440443
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:490076



"Bruno Luong" <b.luong@fogale.findmycountry> wrote in message <gaenr2$dc7$1@fred.mathworks.com>...
> "Matt " <mjacobson.removethis@xorantech.com> wrote in message <gaektb$glf$1@fred.mathworks.com>...
> > 
> > what would it be trying to recover from the m-file where it was born?
> >
> 
> Something such as anonymous nested functions of the local m-file.
> 
> If the mfile is modified/changed/deleted, such information is of course lost together with the m-file that carries the anonymous function.
> 
> Bruno

That makes sense, but that surely doesn't explain why  something as simple as @(x) (x+y) is a problem.