Path: news.mathworks.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!nlpi057.nbdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Marcus M. Edvall" <edvall@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: FOR loops performance - 32bit vs 64 bit Matlab
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <122519c2-549e-466c-afc7-26cdde4baf8f@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
References: <g717k3$kb3$1@news.dialog.net.pl> <gcu81i$rom$1@fred.mathworks.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 190.141.194.142
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1223865320 29439 127.0.0.1 (13 Oct 2008 02:35:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:35:20 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=190.141.194.142; 
	posting-account=QzH06woAAACI9Djndq4ekTlPrC0dZLVS
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; 
	Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; 
	.NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 1493
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:494804


One could wonder if it's related to 32-bit version using 32-bit ints
to index, while 64-bit version uses 64-bit.

Best wishes, Marcus
Tomlab Optimization Inc.
http://tomopt.com/
http://tomsym.com/