Path: news.mathworks.com!not-for-mail
From: "Steve Amphlett" <Firstname.Lastname@Where-I-Work.com>
Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.matlab
Subject: Re: FOR loops performance - 32bit vs 64 bit Matlab
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:27:01 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Ricardo UK Ltd
Lines: 3
Message-ID: <gcvib5$ijm$1@fred.mathworks.com>
References: <g717k3$kb3$1@news.dialog.net.pl> <gcu81i$rom$1@fred.mathworks.com> <122519c2-549e-466c-afc7-26cdde4baf8f@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: "Steve Amphlett" <Firstname.Lastname@Where-I-Work.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: webapp-05-blr.mathworks.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: fred.mathworks.com 1223904421 19062 172.30.248.35 (13 Oct 2008 13:27:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@mathworks.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:27:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: MATLAB Central Newsreader 43398
Xref: news.mathworks.com comp.soft-sys.matlab:494889


<snip>

I understood that the M$ implementation of "long long" (64-bit integer) was very slow.  Maybe this is where to point the finger?